Explaining 20,000 Years BC
Once the great effort is taken to
explain things to someone that has a hard time understanding...the
person explaining them will no longer be able to understand them in
terms that they should be understood?
It is a lessening of a level of
intelligence?
Perhaps it is best said this,
degradation to a lower standard.
If I have to explain everything in
terms that a complete idiot can understand then my mode of thinking
has been forced to degrade to a lower standard. And you will see
assertions from that person of the lower standard then being made.
In support of the lower standard.
As if because they had to be
conditioned to the lower standard it means the lower standard is
superior?
******'
So when you have to explain concepts to
someone that can't catch on, you have to degrade to a lower standard
to do so?
In effect some of the details of the
explanation will need to be eliminated so that the person of the
lower standard can understand. But once the details are eliminated
the person of the lower standard really hasn't been taught anything
or learned anything.
The desire to want to catch on? The
desire to want to be a part of a good brain wave? And not the desire
that the lower standard brainwave should prevail.
The person of the lower standard is
allowed to wrongly fill in the details and does so with their
emotionally disturbed and reactionary vagueary. They didn't learn
what they should because they were willfull not to learn it, whether
or not by intent. They hence willfully interpret something, the
details of understanding, in error. So that they can transform what
is attempted to be taught to them as something they would never need
to remember.
And here we get into the emotional
royalty of the emotionally disturbed blissfully ignorant. I supposed
to switch gears it could be stated this way, they have to be spoiled
in every way in life, because they can't learn? So you have two
elements of royalty. Them being spoiled, how the act of spoiling
them is viewed by them. And the ignorance to the fact that they are
being spoiled manifesting itself as them being spoiled. In other
words that last sentence, they can't learn to not be spoiled.
So is someone like that prone to
violence? Perhaps not as much as you think. Why not? Because they
are not put to the test like the rest of us. Becuase it is known
that they can't be put to the test. A test being representative of
perhaps the standard they should be at in terms of maturity and
intelligence at the age they are at.
And when they get into positions of
authority it is a drag down of our entire nation. But a support
group has been allowed which encourages them. And perhaps this is a
form of fascism.
Kind of a sketchy writing but what the
heck.
And perhaps a person that gets into special education as a teacher has a latent desire and motive to do so?
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
