The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Sunday, April 26, 2026

Wait a Minute Lets Compare 04 26 2026

Section 1

So I am trying to loose a few pounds.  Why?  Because I know that there is a great benefit to health in just loosing a few!  Less wear and tear on joints; because they have to carry less weight.  Easier on the heart.  Etc etc etc.

So this morning I decided to try a sweetener other than sugar.  I found a small paper sweetening packet that had been in a box.  I couldn't find an expiration date on it.  The ingredients listed sucralose.  I won't tell you all the ingredients because I don't want it to be able to be determined what product it is.

So I was an Associate Equity Research Analyst in the Specialty Chemical Sector.  And the person who was the spokesman for the company that made sucralose told me it was discovered when a scientist accidently lit a sugar molecule on fire and then tasted it?  Something like that.  My memory is a little foggy and indeed compromised by those who were born with an ID.

But if that is how it was discovered and that is how it is made how does that compare to the description of it in google search results?  (By the way it tastes pretty good and I am going to stick to it for a while.)


Section 2

Skip to Section 3 reference below and come back here after reading it. It is made by taking sugar and replacing three hydrogen oxygen groups with chlorine?  So the question of this article is.  How is that the equivalent of burning sugar?  A hydrogen oxygen group?  What are they talking about water?  In the burning off process you would be burning the oxygen of that hydrogen oxygen group off? Perhaps burning the hydrogen off too?  Hydrogen in highly flammable.  But when you burn hydrogen you create pure water. 

https://www.bing.com/search?PC=I657&q=can+you+burn+hydrogen&FORM=I657DF

But then where does the chlorine molecule come into play?  For example if the product was discovered by burning sugar then the chlorine molecule wasn't likely present then as an infeed?  So that is an after the fact addition to the product to make it stable.  And the body does need small amounts of chlorine.

But the other question here is what product are they really making the sucralose from?  Is it being made from real sugar?  Or is it being made from a product that would likely be thrown out like corn husks or the cob?

And one might ask the question, first they add high fructose corn syrup to nearly every product that they sell you?  Then they develop this product (somewhat unnatural) because people got diabetes?

Now lets say that we lived in a counterclock world whereby the Devil thinks backwards.  And the devil asks himself, "How can I make Chlorine taste sweet."


© 2026 Thomas Paul Murphy

Section 3 reference. 

Here is the Google search result.





Copilot Search Branding

No comments:

Post a Comment