Part of prayer may be said to be defining why something is wrong.
For example I am praying for so and so because of such and such reasons.
And such and such reasons are the what is wrong.
So indeed, in that last article I defined someone as living in moment to moment of agony.
Perhaps that makes my writing the best form of prayer that there is.
Now let's examine that in conjunction with your Constitutional right to free speech!
To say that you can not define what you believe to be wrong with someone is indeed one of the greatest violations of your right to free speech! And it bridges the gap to also be one of the greatest violations of your freedom of religion!
Did I need to say "God please help this person or this group of people because they live in moment to moment agony." To make it a prayer?
Or did I just need to say, "This person lives in moment to moment agony."
If you can't figure out that people are not meant to live in moment to moment agony then your are part of the antagonist of our United States Constitution of the free. If you can't figure out that when a human being says that, that it implies you pity them in prayer then indeed you are as cold hearted soulless as there can be.
And what good can be said when some odd function creates a government institution that would seek to violate true beliefs? Perhaps mal-define the normal? As that is what those who live in moment to moment agony celebrate? Okay perhaps this article started to veer into leadership principles, and I didn't want to sidetrack it like that.
© 2026 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment