So Prince Philip was implicated as a participant in a child sex trafficking/ prostitution.
And he was rebuked by his own brother the current King of England. And right now over there they can't decide if Philip should still be allowed to be in lineage to be King? Something real simple a conclusion to that they can't figure out.
So he could be considered a top dog and inarguably bad.
But there are English Lords who live and reside in the United States.
So the question is, if the top dog is bad how can it be stated that the little dogs are not bad too? If the top dog is participant to that are we to believe that the little dogs are honorable? (And if you don't ask yourself that type of question you are an apathetic thinker?)
So, are they part of a participant or complacent network of such?
How come neither the media nor .g can flush it out?
Because they like selling the idea of Royalty? It is really selling the idea of mental illness isn't it! No matter what you do in life you will never be as good as that Royal Family Genetic Blood Line, even though the news proves them god awful, lower than the lowest crawling creatures.
The little dogs always want to emulate the top dog.
© 2026 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment