So let's that an extremely wealthy woman of a nontraditional sexual orientation adopts a child.
And that child is miserable its entire life.
I understand that you want to place children in homes and not in orphanages. I get that.
But what I am getting at here. And I have literally believed this my entire life.
If that wealthy person who adopted that child had not gotten wealthy, then perhaps whatever money that was would have better gone to the biological mother of the baby and she could have afforded to keep the child herself.
Republicans hate my ideas! I grew up in the wealthiest town in Wisconsin. And those childhood mentally ill deficit Republican children ...extremely envious of me. That is a Republican idea, keep all babies no matter if their heads are the size of tennis balls or not and always will be. Let that wealthy woman of non-traditional sexual orientation and perhaps marriage raise that child. So what is the hidden Republican necessitated delusion? Wealth means right. That woman is wealthy because she is better! Hence that child raised by her will be better. My head is starting to hurt, I got to stop typing.
Perhaps that child needs to have greater than traditional rights while living in that home?
Perhaps there need to be strict laws with regard to foster parents that would sexually abuse an adoptive child. And here I would argue that whatever money the adoptive foster parents contribute to the situation isn't needed and hence capital punishment would right the situation. Because that money would pop up where it belongs! And never again in their sick hands.
© 2026 Thomas Paul Murphy
It is Sunday and if you can't see the religion in this writing you are a whack job.
PS. If she envy's the mother then she envy's the child.
No comments:
Post a Comment