So when we get into a conflict with an oil reserves country of a different religion, a war, how do we win it?
Can we just bomb them into rubble? No, because they are going to turn on that money tap again and there will be customer and they can rebuild quickly and buy weapons quickly.
So indeed it is as if a too much money equals too big to fail paradigm is superimposed over them?
And can we say it came from us? Are we quilty and unresponsive to our own American public citizens in that same manner? The comparison being, we had banks that were to big to fail and didn't. We had automakers too big to fail and didn't because Uncle Sam helped them. So indeed the idea of free markets is negated right there. I am not saying, in the case of the auto makers that we should not have helped.
And if we don't help the banks, perhaps what caused their failure gleefully drives us into another economic depression that would be a threat just as if it were a confederacy based treason.
But what about the too big to fail tycoons? Is that more of the fair based comparison? Whereby we allowed tycoons, likely involved in child prostitution rings, to not fail.
And when you are talking about a foreign country that absolutely hates women, over there...
I guess the main point here is that we can't expect to bomb them to rubble and that they are not going to be able to come back quickly buy selling that oil and buying weapons, perhaps even trading that oil directly for weapons.
And in this country we do have freedom of religion. It should mean you are free to choose your religion. It should mean that you are allowed to voice why you would never want to be a member of another religion. But it doesn't anymore.
So one could say that there are some elements of our Constitution that have been broken that might contribute to a more entangled future for our country?
Do you want those soldiers over there sick in congested dented shit can boats or should they really be working in United States factories? And there is an element of the person who lacks brains but has brawn viewing themselves as superior and entitled; and that would be professional sports. So that lad isn't going to want to use those muscles in a factory is he. And he isn't going to like being in the boat and having to rely on incoming defense systems and rationed ammo to keep him from sinking locked inside that death trap?
******'
It brings up another point. Missile defense systems on boad a ship. I mean sure. But did you believe you were going to park that boat in the strait of Hormuz and sound the alarm and make sure the silos are ready to go every 2 minutes?
Do you see what I mean?
*******'
And so you ask yourself, what secret answer does the President have to this? Weaken them as much as possible and then send in Israeli led U.S. troops to conduct an operation like was done in Gaza? Is that the plan for the whole gd thing? So here we are getting into an element of intent. Whereby a fool doesn't really understand what their original intent really was when they get in quickly over their head.
I don't think it is good for us?
"Oh, but where will we find another billionaire with the charisma that he has to lead our Party and our country? How will we ever elect someone who is the poster child of trickle down economics?"
Getting off topic. But wouldn't you like to go back in time and ask Ronald Reagan how 36% interest rates on credit card loans fit the intent of his trickle down economics policy?
I mean what is trickling down there? That isn't trickle down that is trickle up? Trickle down was always trickle up?
Sarcasm. Don't you just love it when a mouthy person of poor intellect believes that they created all the money in our nation? And you are like who is a sissy fool like you, who cries at even the slightest of bruises or tiniest of cuts...who never had to get their hands dirty in life once at a job... to pretend like they are the children of money creation?
Can you hear the guy wearing the microphone bolted to his neck at the state fair trying to sell something? His hog head voice booming out. The gestalt of what he is saying, "I am the creator of money."
Okay, kind of an odd diatribe. But I let it roll.
© 2026 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment