So let's say that you had an immigrant trying to get into our country at the border and this could be said about him, "He is only here for our boy's."
And lets say that I mean he is a pedophile. And perhaps that is 90% of what I mean by that.
If I were President, I would not let him in.
But a certain type of liberal would fight for that person's right to come in.
The only reason you would fight to let someone like that in the Country would be if you found an element of commonality with them or personally identified with them. Hence you want to say it is the rightful thing to do so that you don't have the spotlight ever turn on you with regard to that or a related issue?
That issue in the start of the above paragraph represents a subversive element of paranoia that has creeped its way into our county and policy. And I believe it is deep rooted here.
Now my Constitutional Right to free speech ought to protect this writing. But guess who would object to this? That same subversive element of paranoia!
And perhaps it reads like this, normalize everything so that their destructive influence on a Democracy of the free and home of the brave is never publicly detected. Now whose shoes is that person walking in? They are walking in the shoes of a victimizer. Now here is another point, they can't relate to victims because it defeats their sense of superiority to identify with the victims. Victims rights, in the above instance, defeat their sense of empowerment.
In Catholic School they taught us the term "megalomaniac." In order to be one, whereby you create many victims, you can't really have a human soul.
So are immigrants who come to this country who are feeble minded polarized? Either they become gang members and rule by violence or they because docile and weak willed and put up with anything the latter suggests to them? Is there an element of that.
What would happen if farm wages had to comply with a valid standard of living pay? I think your demographic in this nation would change for the better. Perhaps you would have those who couldn't stand the funny money r race leaving the city. And you would have warm and friendly and strong minded rural towns again. That is the future of America I believe in. And yes, it is alcohol free. There have been far too many soulless created by alcohol already.
And with regards to the first line of this article I would never allow someone like that to have a Corporate Charter or be in a supervisory position in the United States if I were President.
Happy New Year!
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment