So the purpose of body cam footage is to make law enforcement accountable for their actions.
But what does it say when they don't want the public to see it? You would almost swear that they would like to delete it?
Is not releasing evidence the same as tampering with it?
I mean, "Only we get to see that evidence?"
What does that mean? That you don't have confidence in how the American Public of our Constitutional Democracy will view that evidence?
I don't like the idea of a "code" being present.
A "code" of conduct is like organized crime. They have a vow of silence.
The vow of silence? Like with regard to releasing the Epstein files? So there you see the convergence of two things don't you?
Idk. Just had to vent this.
You are seeing 10 different angles of something on video. And not the one that is telling.
Almost like you have a film crew set up right there. And they are taking 10 rolls of film from a production of theirs. And that is what they are presenting to the public.
*****'
I want to say something about... forgot it.
Something about the CIA and false flags. What are those ops? They are lies. So who in our government determines what lies are best for the American public? It is preposterous to believe that any lies are good for the American public.
*****'
I want to say something about Data centers. You always see how they want to back up everything on your computer? Why? So they can charge you money?
So they can generalize your data and abstract from it to make money... like panning for gold without having to pan?
So that they can put a virus to the us. And then reopen all our businesses with their transplanted John Bulls?
So they can abstract your intellect and sell it back to you?
Getting pretty close to selling of souls aren't we? I mean literal proof of it.
And they end up putting in solar arrays to power all those data centers? How come those solar arrays never went in place to power the cities the data centers are to be located at?
And the big guy, the billionaire software guy, he was knighted by the Queen! No lie.
******'
If you wait 75 years to release evidence about the JFK assassination, what have you really done? It is like somebody (s) deserved a life sentence in prison and you didn't let it happen? If you wait until the plaintiff is dead before allowing evidence to be presented, you have effectively thwarted the American Justice system. It is like you were hoping for a different demographic to be in place when the evidence was finally released? No, that isn't it. You had the idea that the United States Government would no longer be in place before that evidence would ever be released? That is how I read it!
Now look at that above paragraph in conjunction with someone always floating the idea of them being the last President our country will have and not all of the evidence in the Epstein files has been released?
And anything they do release, (and any killings that they make Btw) they want to be the ones who interpret it to you? They don't want evidence to be able to speak for itself? To speak for the evidence in place of the evidence? Ever know a bad kid who acted this way?
*****'
What was the motive for killing Jesus Christ? The people loved him and satan the living devil loathed him?
And you ask yourself, what happens when we get a leader that the people hate but he wants everyone to believe that it is right to love and cherish him? Perhaps the best evidence of the invalidity of psychiatry is that. They can't commit someone like that. Why not? Because psychiatry is an institution of government and he is the hand that not only feeds them but enriches them. So what is that? It is syncophantism? What is syncophantism? It is a weakness! A weakness put in place in the foundation, pillars and framework of our democracy.
******'
And the people that support the killings in Minnesota do they even know what the Supreme Law of the Land states? It states you can't deprive someone of life, liberty or property without due process. And they defend those killings in the same tough talk of mafia hitmen? And they are using that as propaganda to create fear in the American public. And the Democratic Party is complacent with it. Why? When you impeach someone in this country you ought to remove them from office and bar them.
As if they are making up their own laws? And they don't really amount to anything more than the idea of divine right. Something put him in place. Something that wanted to profit from him? Something that knew he would attempt to...
And you ask yourself in order for an Epstein network to thrive and prosper how many people would have to go along with it? In order for human trafficking to be so prevalent how many people in key positions would have to go along with it? Are these strong minded people? Or are they weak minded people prone to violence; because of that weak mind?
I really don't like writing this stuff. But perhaps it needs to be written. It needs to be cleared of me. Why should I internalize this? I should put this "out there" in hopes that out there transforms to be better?
There are probably an awful lot of dumb people out there. They are weak minded and therefore prone to violence because of that weak mind. And perhaps I just defined fascism better than anyone.
******'
We had other recent Presidents deport a lot of illegal immigrants. But we didn't have this kid of trouble did we. What is resonating downward? Is it the culmination of Reagans trickle down economics? What is it worth?
******'
Has crypto currency been used to launder money from killing people? As if it wasn't bad enough when you found out that big dummy you worked with was getting paid double you were.
© 2026 Thomas Paul Murphy