How come a Police Officer can use Deadly Force but a Court System can't? 07 18 2019
It has to do with those who didn't earn their white collar jobs not wanting to rock the boat?
But one would think that the wielding of deadly force would be at the highest most educated level and not the lowest? Get it?
Does it not bother you that what is deemed the most highest educated level doesn't complain that the wielding of deadly force is done at the lowest level and not the highest level?
Just let the hunchback castle guard minion use whatever subjective discretion they arrive at?
Doesn't matter that the honest ones put their life in danger apprehending a dangerous criminal that the upper level will not wield deadly force on.
If the upper level wanted to wield deadly force (Death Penalty) wouldn't they have the power to legislate it?
Off topic. So my business failure theory amounts to this, when you get too many retards under the same roof the business fails.
© 2019 Thomas Paul Murphy
Oops. Just flushed it out. It means the higher court system trusts the lower level judgement better than their own.
That's wrong.
That machination is something that you could not draft me into a War in order to protect it.
And here we go again. Soldiers who fight and kill the wrong people in wars on foreign soil are court marshalled and either go to jail or are executed. But you will never see that happen to the low level person mentioned above. Again why not? Because those given the bench trust their judgment better than their own.
That is the gestalt existence of the Posi Comitatas.
Are there women Judges who would not have become Judges if they had to wield the Death Penalty and be accountable for it?
It has to do with those who didn't earn their white collar jobs not wanting to rock the boat?
But one would think that the wielding of deadly force would be at the highest most educated level and not the lowest? Get it?
Does it not bother you that what is deemed the most highest educated level doesn't complain that the wielding of deadly force is done at the lowest level and not the highest level?
Just let the hunchback castle guard minion use whatever subjective discretion they arrive at?
Doesn't matter that the honest ones put their life in danger apprehending a dangerous criminal that the upper level will not wield deadly force on.
If the upper level wanted to wield deadly force (Death Penalty) wouldn't they have the power to legislate it?
Off topic. So my business failure theory amounts to this, when you get too many retards under the same roof the business fails.
© 2019 Thomas Paul Murphy
Oops. Just flushed it out. It means the higher court system trusts the lower level judgement better than their own.
That's wrong.
That machination is something that you could not draft me into a War in order to protect it.
And here we go again. Soldiers who fight and kill the wrong people in wars on foreign soil are court marshalled and either go to jail or are executed. But you will never see that happen to the low level person mentioned above. Again why not? Because those given the bench trust their judgment better than their own.
That is the gestalt existence of the Posi Comitatas.
Are there women Judges who would not have become Judges if they had to wield the Death Penalty and be accountable for it?
No comments:
Post a Comment