Hunting and Land Owner Preference 12 06 2017
It is amazing how they can come to determinations that are 180 degrees of what they should be.
A landowner who is involved in runoff activities that pollute our waters, thereby leading to greater fish stocking costs, should NEVER be allowed to have a Hunting and Fishing License issued to them.
They can indeed be easily identified.
Same goes for the management of a Corporation that is responsible for pollution. That management should not be issued hunting and fishing licenses.
Now do you see how quickly this could lead towards the goal of the Clean Water Act?
They've got it all wrong and they get everything wrong. It is like you took the village idiot with a non-symmetrical mis-shaped head and put him in power behind the legislative scenes.
© 2017 Thomas Murphy
Part II
The "Lobbyists" have been using the pretense of matching costs directly to revenues. But if you think about the way they go about that; it is complete pretense. If you matched costs to expenses those Republican Lobbyists who advocate their Down's Syndrome people would not be in this country anymore.
But look at who we have as Governor and the origin of his faulted thinking. If you look at his upbringing his father was a minister. So where do the Revenues come from? Gifts, charity, welfare if you will. But what the the costs or expenses to that welfare? Basically it is all based on the reputation of the establishment that is the charity. So if someone in the community disagrees with it they are considered a cost. But what does that really make that charity? It is a pass through organization to the wealthiest contributors in that county isn't it.
So you can see how that is wrong and how it creates liability for a land of the Free. So how do we change that?
We could establish that a patron cannot contribute over a certain amount because it is deemed public influencing or graft. We could establish maintenance rates for such facilities and any amounts received above that amount are sent to the treasury? No because you have the same pass-through effect but more deeply entrenched. The best way is that it must be immediately returned to the contributor and the staff of that facility may not possess money above a certain level. It kind of ferrets out what you really believe in doesn't it. That last stipulation is completely consistent with the will of Christ in Christianity. So to practice other than that is Religious Fraud. Now what should the penalty for Religious Fraud be? Because religion is a belief system like a form of Government is; it amounts to TREASON!
© 2017 Thomas Paul Murphy
It is amazing how they can come to determinations that are 180 degrees of what they should be.
A landowner who is involved in runoff activities that pollute our waters, thereby leading to greater fish stocking costs, should NEVER be allowed to have a Hunting and Fishing License issued to them.
They can indeed be easily identified.
Same goes for the management of a Corporation that is responsible for pollution. That management should not be issued hunting and fishing licenses.
Now do you see how quickly this could lead towards the goal of the Clean Water Act?
They've got it all wrong and they get everything wrong. It is like you took the village idiot with a non-symmetrical mis-shaped head and put him in power behind the legislative scenes.
© 2017 Thomas Murphy
Part II
The "Lobbyists" have been using the pretense of matching costs directly to revenues. But if you think about the way they go about that; it is complete pretense. If you matched costs to expenses those Republican Lobbyists who advocate their Down's Syndrome people would not be in this country anymore.
But look at who we have as Governor and the origin of his faulted thinking. If you look at his upbringing his father was a minister. So where do the Revenues come from? Gifts, charity, welfare if you will. But what the the costs or expenses to that welfare? Basically it is all based on the reputation of the establishment that is the charity. So if someone in the community disagrees with it they are considered a cost. But what does that really make that charity? It is a pass through organization to the wealthiest contributors in that county isn't it.
So you can see how that is wrong and how it creates liability for a land of the Free. So how do we change that?
We could establish that a patron cannot contribute over a certain amount because it is deemed public influencing or graft. We could establish maintenance rates for such facilities and any amounts received above that amount are sent to the treasury? No because you have the same pass-through effect but more deeply entrenched. The best way is that it must be immediately returned to the contributor and the staff of that facility may not possess money above a certain level. It kind of ferrets out what you really believe in doesn't it. That last stipulation is completely consistent with the will of Christ in Christianity. So to practice other than that is Religious Fraud. Now what should the penalty for Religious Fraud be? Because religion is a belief system like a form of Government is; it amounts to TREASON!
© 2017 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment