I asked the question does Cow's Milk contain DNA 05 18 2018
The answer is YES. But it isn't DNA of the Cow in it, it is DNA of Lactobacillus Bulgaricus bacteria present in the milk.
https://www.answers.com/Q/Can_you_find_DNA_in_milk
https://www.healthline.com/health/digestive-health/lactobacillus-bulgaricus
What is one of the possible side effects?
https://www.healthline.com/health/digestive-health/lactobacillus-bulgaricus#safety
Fungemia.
What is Fungemia?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungemia
The presence of Fungus or Yeast in your blood!
https://www.healthline.com/health/digestive-health/lactobacillus-bulgaricus#safety
And another side effect is the deadly sepsis which is a blood infection. (although it states something likely only in immune compromised individuals.)
Now could I tie this article into the concepts of a milk Allergy and thrush?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk_allergy
http://candida-yeast-infection-relief.com/
I also want to ask the question about a drug dealer targeting a young person who is experiencing the side effects of a milk allergy? And perhaps how many children get bad grades because of a milk allergy? But no one really cares do they. No one cares about clean water. Feed the cows so we have milk and dirty the water in the process. Do you know that can't continue forever? Do you understand that certain things introduce their own finite structure?
If there wasn't lactobacillus bulgaricus in milk your milk would never sour?
https://bacillusbulgaricus.com/lactobacillus-bulgaricus/
What is the origin of the word bulgaricus?
Bulgaria?
The country Bulgaria's name comes from an ancient tribe of Turks who founded the country and they were called Bulgars.
Why were they called the Bulgars?
At first the article states they were a mixed race, confused and disturbed. People prone to producing a state of disorder. As always, I give you the reference in the form of a website link after I quote it. But scholars are unsure of the origin. Could mean other things to. The link goes into detail. But it doesn't narrow it to exactly what it means.
(What does it mean when 10 scholars can't agree? Does it mean 9 of them are closed minded and can't see something from the ones research? Does it mean 9 of the 10 are illegitimate? It amounts to subjective interpretation of history? But we see that wrongly applied in our modern day life all the time don't we! Your media has no understanding of the purpose and intent of the Constitution. To them it is something to gnaw away at just as their mother henpecked away their individuality out of jealousy.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars
Very interesting. Has always sounded funny and odd to me.
So I now have to ask the question where does that bacteria come from? The spittle of some old Bulgarian hag?
© 2018 Thomas Murphy
Now I have to ask the question, "Can milk be fermented without something that contains DNA?" Chemical fermentation? Is there a combination of chemicals that can ferment milk? A combination of chemicals that mimic's the chemicals present in milk fermenting bacteria? Or chemicals introduced to milk in series that would mimic the effect of bacterial fermentation? Conceivably bacteria breaking down protein structures...the bacteria are doing so via chemical effect?
Fermentation, consumes sugar in the absense of oxygen. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fermentation&t=ffnt&ia=web
So it is an organism feeding that ferments.
In effect you would have to create an artificial lifeform without DNA to consume the sugar and ferment something? Could it be done? Very interesting isn't it? To ferment something has to feed? Can that statement be proven false through scientific method discovery?
What can consume sugar in the absence of oxygen that isn't DNA based? Right there we might be encroaching on the concept of what makes life life? Perhaps a cell transport or filter flow process, as occurs inside a battery?
I also believe that we have been too narrow minded with regard to how we have defined yeast versus bacteria. Sometimes science fails us because it defines based on how something is effected versus how it effects? The latter is more important. I think the whole concept is due for revision. And it would get too complicated because in order to learn something you have to learn it a certain way. Which would mean that one might be asking themselves what is the starting point of this? And somehow that concept is lost? Why, because upon redefinition certain aspects are considered equal irregardless of origin of understanding? Hence you end up with something that cannot be taught because it can't start from square one. When individual "square ones" are of diverse origin.
But lets take another look at it. Take the concept of money out of it. Take the concept of how to profit from it out of it. And then you might end up with a better frame of reference where the effect is considered equal upon comparison and that is the starting point? And I know what I am attempting to articulate here is confusing. But I will assert that a lot of science would be better understood and more science would be discovered and science would indeed be more true and of benefit to the human race if the above concept were applied. But what does it mean? How do you apply that concept? How do you take the money out of it? There is only one way isn't there. You actually have to take the money out of it via Government action. And indeed the Bible does tell us to be righteous. What does that mean? It is interpreted to mean to be the biggest contributor to the church. But that isn't what Jesus would mean the concept to be is it. You would have to actually read and be able to have a working comprehension of what you read in the Bible to understand that.
Hey its a Friday night and this is a Diatribe. What are your other options? Drunken driving? Contracting VD? Being introduced to new drugs? Darn that little Sh17 and his chemistry set. It is really just his mothers spittle isn't it. Wait a minute, why don't you do all of the above and get pregnant while you are at it. Put that child up for adoption so it can be the object of money? Easy to educate when they are incapable of meeting academic standards. Sounds like a cush cush job. Just talk to them with a matter of fact tone in your voice. And never get seriously mad at anyone because they are a screw up. That is just normality? Can't get paid moo-la if you consider it to be any other way. Won't go to the abortion clinic because you fear violence against yourself as you are pregnant with child. See the hypocrisy there? I don't dare say you ruin peoples lives with your hatred of them being fertile and you not? I don't dare say that someone who ostensibly takes a vow of celibacy out of doing the work of the Lord should never feel that they have the personal knowledge based authority to tell a heterosexual what they should or should not do. I don't dare say that what you market in that church is the leading cause of mental retardation in the Western Hemisphere. I don't dare say that is a horrific future to put a young woman through. I don't dare say you desire to do so out of the misery loves company motivation. Not really aware of your own motivations are you. Did you think that was a complement when Jesus said, "They know not what they do?"
That's it. Sat down and started typing. And this is what was produced. What does it say about someone who intentionally causes other people to err so that they feel they have a reason to judge them? That is a hay-wired person isn't it!
Wait a minute here is one that is even more convoluted than that. To cause someone to err so that you can forgive them for erring. Kind of nauseating isn't it?
Copyright 2018 Thomas Paul Murphy
The answer is YES. But it isn't DNA of the Cow in it, it is DNA of Lactobacillus Bulgaricus bacteria present in the milk.
https://www.answers.com/Q/Can_you_find_DNA_in_milk
https://www.healthline.com/health/digestive-health/lactobacillus-bulgaricus
What is one of the possible side effects?
https://www.healthline.com/health/digestive-health/lactobacillus-bulgaricus#safety
Fungemia.
What is Fungemia?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungemia
The presence of Fungus or Yeast in your blood!
https://www.healthline.com/health/digestive-health/lactobacillus-bulgaricus#safety
And another side effect is the deadly sepsis which is a blood infection. (although it states something likely only in immune compromised individuals.)
Now could I tie this article into the concepts of a milk Allergy and thrush?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk_allergy
http://candida-yeast-infection-relief.com/
I also want to ask the question about a drug dealer targeting a young person who is experiencing the side effects of a milk allergy? And perhaps how many children get bad grades because of a milk allergy? But no one really cares do they. No one cares about clean water. Feed the cows so we have milk and dirty the water in the process. Do you know that can't continue forever? Do you understand that certain things introduce their own finite structure?
If there wasn't lactobacillus bulgaricus in milk your milk would never sour?
https://bacillusbulgaricus.com/lactobacillus-bulgaricus/
What is the origin of the word bulgaricus?
Bulgaria?
The country Bulgaria's name comes from an ancient tribe of Turks who founded the country and they were called Bulgars.
Why were they called the Bulgars?
At first the article states they were a mixed race, confused and disturbed. People prone to producing a state of disorder. As always, I give you the reference in the form of a website link after I quote it. But scholars are unsure of the origin. Could mean other things to. The link goes into detail. But it doesn't narrow it to exactly what it means.
(What does it mean when 10 scholars can't agree? Does it mean 9 of them are closed minded and can't see something from the ones research? Does it mean 9 of the 10 are illegitimate? It amounts to subjective interpretation of history? But we see that wrongly applied in our modern day life all the time don't we! Your media has no understanding of the purpose and intent of the Constitution. To them it is something to gnaw away at just as their mother henpecked away their individuality out of jealousy.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars
Very interesting. Has always sounded funny and odd to me.
So I now have to ask the question where does that bacteria come from? The spittle of some old Bulgarian hag?
© 2018 Thomas Murphy
Now I have to ask the question, "Can milk be fermented without something that contains DNA?" Chemical fermentation? Is there a combination of chemicals that can ferment milk? A combination of chemicals that mimic's the chemicals present in milk fermenting bacteria? Or chemicals introduced to milk in series that would mimic the effect of bacterial fermentation? Conceivably bacteria breaking down protein structures...the bacteria are doing so via chemical effect?
Fermentation, consumes sugar in the absense of oxygen. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fermentation&t=ffnt&ia=web
So it is an organism feeding that ferments.
In effect you would have to create an artificial lifeform without DNA to consume the sugar and ferment something? Could it be done? Very interesting isn't it? To ferment something has to feed? Can that statement be proven false through scientific method discovery?
What can consume sugar in the absence of oxygen that isn't DNA based? Right there we might be encroaching on the concept of what makes life life? Perhaps a cell transport or filter flow process, as occurs inside a battery?
I also believe that we have been too narrow minded with regard to how we have defined yeast versus bacteria. Sometimes science fails us because it defines based on how something is effected versus how it effects? The latter is more important. I think the whole concept is due for revision. And it would get too complicated because in order to learn something you have to learn it a certain way. Which would mean that one might be asking themselves what is the starting point of this? And somehow that concept is lost? Why, because upon redefinition certain aspects are considered equal irregardless of origin of understanding? Hence you end up with something that cannot be taught because it can't start from square one. When individual "square ones" are of diverse origin.
But lets take another look at it. Take the concept of money out of it. Take the concept of how to profit from it out of it. And then you might end up with a better frame of reference where the effect is considered equal upon comparison and that is the starting point? And I know what I am attempting to articulate here is confusing. But I will assert that a lot of science would be better understood and more science would be discovered and science would indeed be more true and of benefit to the human race if the above concept were applied. But what does it mean? How do you apply that concept? How do you take the money out of it? There is only one way isn't there. You actually have to take the money out of it via Government action. And indeed the Bible does tell us to be righteous. What does that mean? It is interpreted to mean to be the biggest contributor to the church. But that isn't what Jesus would mean the concept to be is it. You would have to actually read and be able to have a working comprehension of what you read in the Bible to understand that.
Hey its a Friday night and this is a Diatribe. What are your other options? Drunken driving? Contracting VD? Being introduced to new drugs? Darn that little Sh17 and his chemistry set. It is really just his mothers spittle isn't it. Wait a minute, why don't you do all of the above and get pregnant while you are at it. Put that child up for adoption so it can be the object of money? Easy to educate when they are incapable of meeting academic standards. Sounds like a cush cush job. Just talk to them with a matter of fact tone in your voice. And never get seriously mad at anyone because they are a screw up. That is just normality? Can't get paid moo-la if you consider it to be any other way. Won't go to the abortion clinic because you fear violence against yourself as you are pregnant with child. See the hypocrisy there? I don't dare say you ruin peoples lives with your hatred of them being fertile and you not? I don't dare say that someone who ostensibly takes a vow of celibacy out of doing the work of the Lord should never feel that they have the personal knowledge based authority to tell a heterosexual what they should or should not do. I don't dare say that what you market in that church is the leading cause of mental retardation in the Western Hemisphere. I don't dare say that is a horrific future to put a young woman through. I don't dare say you desire to do so out of the misery loves company motivation. Not really aware of your own motivations are you. Did you think that was a complement when Jesus said, "They know not what they do?"
That's it. Sat down and started typing. And this is what was produced. What does it say about someone who intentionally causes other people to err so that they feel they have a reason to judge them? That is a hay-wired person isn't it!
Wait a minute here is one that is even more convoluted than that. To cause someone to err so that you can forgive them for erring. Kind of nauseating isn't it?
Copyright 2018 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment