"When the best advice you can give someone is horse sh1t."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
I created this Newspaper to put forth a much needed point of view. I have talked to many who have worked for Milwaukee's dominant news source on the side, and they have even expressed interest in my point of view. The Pulitzer prize was founded after Pulitzer because he created a newspaper that exposed great wrongdoings. He went against the other established Newspapers with his Newspaper that exposed corruption. His newspaper became number one. World News Starts Here!
"When the best advice you can give someone is horse sh1t."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Alcohol is a Group 1 Carcinogen. That is the highest level. It is the same level as asbestos, radiation and tobacco.
You know, I would go so far as this. If you were diagnosed with cancer you should not be able to buy alcohol. Or you could wave that and in turn none of us have to foot the bill for your health care expenses. Republicans always want to be cute and match revenues to what they think are expenses. But they don't get it right.
What I am getting at is if you are diagnosed with cancer the smartest thing you could do (IMHO) would be to abstain. How many illnesses progress to cancer? Same remedy w/r to ~ illness.
Things they won't tell you. Read it and weep.
Thomas Murphy
A new Comic Superhero Woman would be
"Nuclear Reactor Woman"
This would be a woman that fell into a Nuclear Reactor and mysteriously emerged with superhuman strength and powers.
Although she looks a bit pale and her clothes just kind of hang on her.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
If I were President of the United States I would annex Vatican City and change the management.
From all (thousands) accounts they hid sexual abuse of children by Priests. While at the same time lobbying for the rich to bail them out of lawsuits? Can you explain what your motive was to sexually molest children?
I think Jesus Christ would condemn that. Just like he took a staff to the money changers who occupied the temple when he went out preaching one time.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
When we throw darts do we expect that God aims them for us?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
A little more on this.
Ps. So the Romans were invading and Jesus said to the people of his village something like, "You fools for how many times have I tried to train you in the courtyard?"
The problem there being that they had faith in a savior and not confidence in their own developed abilities? Why bother, they erroneously thought.
Do you know what made Jesus braver than anything else? His condemnation of the rich! Godly to have that strength!
My experience with snow in Milwaukee is that once it finds us it just keeps coming.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
And it comes with it's own trifold single use spoon. I would probably put it in a knapsack and take it fishing with me.
Thomas Murphy
Can't get access to the garbage can? Don't let that impede your work or cleaning. Temporarily mount a plastic sack like so.
And this idea can be upgraded to use an oak dowel with some spacing pegs or perhaps the use of an overlapping wood shaped u bracket. Both as depicted in image.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Purchased it today and ate half of it.
From Scordato Bakery at 5011 W. Howard Ave Milwaukee. Their about us section of their website is a real good read.
If you can't fit the pie in the refrigerator bend the pie tie per photo and see if it fits. Usually that is all the more you need to fit it in.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"Please sir, this is all my retirement money, will you churn it to nothing for me?"
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
And you know they market mutual funds like they are risk free.
But they will also never truthfully tell you where all the money goes in a stock market collapse.
But Jesse Livermore did! He said that he made more money on the day of the stock market collapse than any other time in his life, or something like that. What I am getting at is, you just don't lose it when that happens, it actually goes into someone else's pockets.
And I do ask the question, was the stock market "shorted" in 1929 because the rich were fed up with Prohibition? The rich were fed up with not legally being able to drink alcohol? You know, I actually believe that. Look who was President? A drunk with Poleo who drove around the country giving alcohol out to farmers while at the same time he secured the rights to sell foreign alcohol into the U.S. Talk about corruption. Did it officially start there? It never really officially starts does it. It is just always with us. Like how the Bible tells of the miserable ones who are still with us.
Just a brief comment here. A principal is there to handle and discipline bad kids? Whether it be immediate expulsion or detentions. But what should that job description include when the bad kids today are extremely violent and can and do wield guns? Should principals be required to carry a gun?
It is a really bad precedent to admit you have to set? And in today's day and age where authority figures are dealing drugs and accused of sexual misconduct literally left and right, it could take our nation further down the path corruption.
******'
So a Police Officer is an Officer of the Court, He arrives on the seen of a shooting at a school where a 16 year old (that is the average age of mass shooters) is killing people. And he shoots that child and kills it.
So in effect you have the death penalty being administered to a child by the lowest level of the judicial system? And perhaps there is a better way to phrase that.
So doesn't it beg the question about the death penalty being administered to children at the Judges bench level?
I am not going to comment any further on that. Even though my freedom of speech should allow me to.
*****'
But it almost absurd to think that you could train a principal to shoot children that are killing people?
So what is this? This is an issue where you have to step back from the forest of it and make a conclusion as to what has gone wrong in our country? And then the other aspect of that is how can it really be fixed?
The answer isn't gun control. The answer isn't driverless cars. The answer isn't infringing on your right to free speech.
Oh there is a good one. How many things that should be allowed to be said today are no longer protected by your first amendment to free speech? Fine you to the point whereby you are out of house and home if you said it? And that violates the Constitution to.
So then you ask yourself, who did we need to lessen our Constitution for so that they could have the semblance of being assimilated into our Democracy? My dad always said it was the Republicans who want to take away your rights. And they kind of go about it in an ostensibly clumsy way? They make everyone want to beg that lessening your rights is necessitated?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
So the media kept posing the question about a motive. Apparantely, she has a manifesto out there.
But before I read that this morning I was thinking. What good does it do to speculate on a motive when we don't even know all the evidence from the Kennedy assassination, because it is deemed top secret?
Do you follow my logic here? So have we ever been told what the motives where for mass shooters? Do we really know why the guy on the rooftop took aim and grazed Trumps ear? If we asked Trump, "It has been so many months since the shooter took aim at you...you have a higher level of top secret clearance than the rest of us,..what was that shooters motive?" He isn't going to answer with an elaborate answer is he.
So my point here might be, once the motives are known they are rarely shared with the public?
Do you ever hear the newscaster say, "Oh, and we just learned now of the motive for that shooting that took place 6 months ago. It is big news!" The news doesn't work that way does it. They don't lobby for those Kennedy files either, Warren Commission Report (sp?)
Okay now this one ought to bend your mind a little bit. Did you ever ask yourself, "What is the motive of Organized Crime?"
Did you come to the conclusion those are people who couldn't be educated to earn an honest living?
And did the why of that ever bother you in any way?
Did you ever consider people not being able to be educated a problem for our country?
The way that is handled today is, "Just find jobs for them?"
*****'
Tens of thousands of little children were sexually molested by "religious" priests. If you were to ask Pope Francis or another high ranking "religious" person what the motive was for those sexual molestations was, could they truthfully answer it
Did you ever see a kid that was odd, walked odd, looked ugly and acted retarded and your mother told you to stay away from them? And somehow you knew she was right? Even though you might have been taught or naturally believed not to fear such people? Do you see what I am getting at?
Perhaps it is this, what type of person would tell you that you should have zero concern? It really isn't the greatest advice to give people is it.
******'
Just a brief comment here. A principle is there to handle and discipline bad kids? Whether it be immediate expulsion or detentions. But what should that job description include when the bad kids today are extremely violent and can and do wield guns? Should principles be required to carry a gun?
Okay I am copying that last paragraph into the start of a new article.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
So once on television I believe I heard two lesbians describe a specific male as being "a man imposter."
Out of that adult male exhibiting general weakness that was not of the standard of a man.
Okay, all well and good, perhaps.
But the question then becomes what would "a woman imposter" be in terms of their definition?
Is it something less than a woman? Would it be a man attempting to show the strength of a woman? Or would it be a woman that didn't act like a woman should act to them, again a woman less than a woman?
I am just curious what their definition of "a woman imposter" would be.
To me I think it would be an adult female who has absolutely no idea how to raise children.
Or perhaps it would be an adult female who neglected to raise children as she instead vied to be successful in the corporate world? And that would make her two things wouldn't it? A woman imposter and a man imposter?
But the question is again, what is the deducted definition?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
After paying for utilities, you might have enough money left over to buy a can of cat food.
And his next words are highly likely to be, "I like the kind of people who don't need S***** S*******."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Does big health care insurance have their hand in the Social Security till? I would say they do.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
You don't see it too much do you?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"You have nowhere to go but into the emptiness of your lies."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"Before you get excited about the ice cream cone coupons; you check the expiration dates."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
A driverless car that drives itself to the dealership when it needs maintenance and then drives itself home with the bill of such maintenance for you.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
I am not some imbecile that thinks in terms of Tic Tack Toe grids. I know how to read!!!!
The labels my illustrator are pointing to are mine.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
The Republican propagandized idea that if you put your money into private investments, you would do a lot better than what the gov pays you at retirement?
I have never heard a greater lie in my lifetime than that!
1. Most people lose money in the stock market!
2. I am betting that if you took the money the average American lost in the stock market and compounded it at a 9% rate you would have their retirement income paid for? Do you see what I am getting at?
Most people strive to make money in the stock market so that they don't have to rely on Social Security in retirement. But in reality if money was not taken from their paychecks in order to fund social security and instead they invested it, I bet it would be a much larger sink hole! A skid row sink hole!
I'll get you the stats on how many people make money in the stock market. And I wouldn't be the first to say that broker of yours is trading against you!
how many people lose money in the stock market - Search
90% of people who buy stocks lose money! That is the statistic.
I don't believe that we should fund Wall Street. That would mean a new investment structure and regulations. Elizabeth Warren in on a idea related to it. Holding Corporations responsible for illegal activity and revoking what would be a required charter to be one.
But if management of a corporation commits fraud or a criminal activity should that management be allowed to work in corporate America again? I saw no. Give them a ticket in the bread and cheese line! I mean if you can institutionally label people as being mentally ill then you can also create a class structure for Corporate American criminals. The basics of it being, you get to stand in line in the bread and cheese line to get your food. No, what the heck do you need a car for? A criminal has no place to go! Think you will go for a ride in your car in search of new victims? Nope, you can't have a car or a driverless car either for that.
What about holding corporate management accountable for fraud and investors actually getting their money back? Arbitration has no teeth.
I suppose the Republicans think in terms of a class structure. One whereby if you can get away with cheating people and get rich from it, you will be favored? Your part of the good Ole boy network?
You want to know what else has no real teeth, settlements distributed from class action lawsuits. Somehow they never get where they should go, like a river gets dried up in the dessert?
Mutual funds are not the answer either. They go down and out with a sinking titanic market too!
So what the title off this really accomplishes is funding the non working class, creating barriers to upward mobility.
*****'
Off topic. Who was that famous guy that said the mafia controls the music industry? How sick it is if that were true! And I believe it is
Who was that other famous guy who told us who controls the porn industry?
Enough said.
Wait a minute. The whole gist of this relates to how the reserve for your retirement income guaranteed by the gov should be controlled. If it is privatized, you have essentially defeated Social Security. Because there is no security in that 90% loss rate.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
I want to talk about something else too, but I just lost it to the distracting jealous voice.
It might be this, Free? Health care was invented by a German and put in place in Germany in the late 1800's
"Chancellor Otto von Bismarck started the first social health insurance system in the world in Germany with his Health Insurance Act of 18831234." Source Google search.
That would be an interesting read.
And you can never have free health care when you have an organized criminal occult voodoo religious institution as part of it.
Jesus Christ who drove demons out of people, would I get an Amen from you?
Was that mega German Battleship named after Otto bon B...?
Republicans sure like the idea of sinking Social Security don't they.
Perhaps the real reason they have for wanting to limit health care is that we have Doctors that really don't want to be Doctors? They just want the title and the money? And what did Jesus Christ tell Doctors, "Doctor heal thyself." He knew that they really wouldn't be able to do that. So did it imply something else?
So I just read some different news items.
One about a child who was given fentanyl by a drug dealer and died. I don't believe that I owe him a life in prison. (In other words that is money coming out of my pocket that shouldn't be, and the answer isn't that he should be freed.
I don't owe a sodomite hierarchy a life in prison.
I don't owe child molesters a life in prison.
I don't owe a pimp a life in prison.
Other things that I don't owe.
I don't believe I owe the hyperactive, rude and mentally defective son or daughter of alcoholics a semblance of an education.
Had to say it. I could probably go on and on. But why bother, it doesn't do any good.
*****'
Bonus item? I want to say that nobody ever learned how to sing by listening to a certain late night talk show host sing.
****'
I don't believe I owe an annual payment to a school system whereby some of that money goes to religious schools who propagandize antiabortion and help to criminalize women who have abortions. I don't owe that! Can you imagine if you were a woman who almost died do to an botched abortion? Then at the end of the year you have to pay that community fee that goes in support of the very religious school that had no biblical or word of god substance to support such a point of view? When I was a boy I viewed the priesthood as kind of a last resort something I could do if I failed in other professions? But when I got older I realized that good men were not attracted to the priesthood or promoted in it. In other words I wouldn't want to be one because to me they are a collection of weak mean hobo like ho...
And also when I read that Jesus cast demons out of people, I realize that the church is more about putting the demons in people? The human race doesn't get any benefit from that.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Couldn't get the Avocado to mash so I chopped it fine, added a little guacamole spice mix and cilantro and... eating it this way. Good. Cilantro isn't a mint but the Mexican restaurant will often tell you the way the eat tacos in MX is just meat and Cilantro and something else. Cilantro looks similar to a mint. I typically didn't associate Mexican food as being minty. So that is a new something to think about.
Apparently cilantro turns into the coriander.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
A question is an opportunity for applied intellect.
If I am ever going to buy one I want one that isn't shaped like a duck.
If I called that mega rich guy "Duckie" would the nickname stick?
Oh, here is another bad joke. We need driverless cars so that we can get all of our ducks in a row
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
https://www.google.com/search?q=guy+fawkes+mask&client=firefox-b-1-d&sca_esv=dc4af9efbdb98de8&ei=4yhaZ4W1HeS90PEPxdXegQM&ved=0ahUKEwjFsqTT96CKAxXkHjQIHcWqNzAQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=guy+fawkes+mask&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiD2d1eSBmYXdrZXMgbWFzazIFEAAYgAQyCBAAGIAEGLEDMgUQABiABDIFEC4YgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgARIzA9Q2wJYnA1wAngBkAEAmAGSAaAB3ASqAQM0LjK4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgigAr8FwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICDRAAGIAEGLADGEMYigXCAg4QABiwAxjkAhjWBNgBAcICExAuGIAEGLADGEMYyAMYigXYAQHCAgoQABiABBhDGIoFwgINEAAYgAQYsQMYQxiKBcICBxAAGIAEGArCAgYQABgWGB6YAwCIBgGQBhO6BgYIARABGAmSBwM2LjKgB5wo&sclient=gws-wiz-serp
How long before a modern Joan of Arc type woman gets going?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
And 3 employees got fired because of it.
I hate to be look bad but I am with the employees!
Here you have employees running around to cook and serve people food. They have to be quick on their feet and have a good working memory.
And on the other hand you have people that will never be able to support themselves.
Okay, but that isn't the real issue that bothers me here.
Have you ever met a person with a mental handicap that was the most disgusting, rude, insulting, ugly, spoiled ill mannered person possible? If you don't know what I am talking about then you don't know what the problem is or what the real issue is here.
I am not going to articulate it. And you are not going to condemn me for this. But I am asserting that the above paragraph is what holds true!
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
And one more thing. I wonder if the issue would be as bad as it is if they were not "subsidized" in some way? You want to clean up the nations balance sheet and income statement? Right there!
About Pro Life 12 11 2024
Contrary to what Bishops and other religious figures say about the issue.
I think that Jesus Christ would have an absolute fit he knew that poor womens babies were being “transferred” to either rich couples or LGBTQ couples.
And I do believe that is the gist of the pro life movement.
The thought that a woman couldn't afford to keep her baby and had to give it up to a rich couple has bothered me since I was a boy.
I think Jesus Christ would have a fit.
He would say you give that money to the poor woman to feed he baby before you buy dog food for your pets.
And if a family is torn apart from alcoholism you bar them from alcohol.
And if the man of the house is disabled you give that family its daily bread just like Jesus Christ told you.
Why does a rich person think that is theirs?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Didn't mean to publish this. But I hit the key. So I will leave it out there.
"Having more money than is representative of your responsibleness."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
If someone believes that they can pardon anyone they want for any reason do they also believe that they can put anyone they want in prison for any reason or no reason at all?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
I really do believe that our entire economy is like Moe saying with the threat of violence, "Give me that!" ..that he can do it better.
Our jobs were not lost overseas, they were lost here.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"You're not going to goose chase me wild."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
You give them some straight talk like a coach with and they bottle it all up inside.
When they can get away they go and cry; until they look at their fingernails and wonder if they need a manicure.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"He didn't really mean that?"
"If he didn't mean then he should have kept his mouth shut."
Oh Christ let's get right to the point.
"If he didn't mean that he should not have said it!"
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
What does it mean when they find the ugliest Republican around to get up there and threaten to nil your Social Security?
Perhaps it is best to delve into the psychology of ugliness and fear?
When we see something ugly are we naturally afraid of it? I would assert yes.
Why? Because it is odd and there is danger in oddness? Per with oddness something isn't quite right is it!
And has there been an initiative to on one hand make us afraid of ugliness in matters we should not have fear of and on the other hand make us not fear or perhaps better stated normalizing ugliness?
In other words there is something wrong with you if you view ugliness while on the other hand ugliness will be used to control you?
It is a lot like organized crime isn't it? "Who can we get to give that person a good scare or beating?"
But analyze the two end of the same problem and what ultimate conclusion do you come to?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
So during the Viet Nam War the "enemy" made tortured American Soldiers read statements that denounced Capitalism while they video recorded them?
But what about Government and Military Secrecy?
Have United States Soldiers ever been required by our Military to read false statements while being video recorded as part of what might be considered an extension of a False Flag event or a CIA directive?
I wonder.
Have whistle blowers been required to put on trans dresses and act like "Klinger?"
I wonder.
But what about your right to free speech? It would seem that if that were true it would violate a supreme right to free speech!
Now what if you saw something happen in the military, perhaps two high ranking officers were engaged in a homosexual act. Could you be court marshalled if you revealed it?
But more to the point, what does it make of you when anything like that...anything like that you are prevented from saying? I would say that it is persecution of you and highly indicative of weakness in leadership of our country.
You here War stories. I have heard some. And I can't repeat them. Of our own soldiers doing horrific things to our own soldiers. And do you know what I think? The bad ones should have never made it back here!
But to put the clamp on a mans mouth. I would say it is an egregious violation of your Constitutional rights! To squelch who you are as a person like that! To form you into that weakness. To make you scared and mouselike for what you saw and no is true. In effect to make you into a perpetuator of evil.
Got to stop and make coffee.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"You haven't seen enough in order to be able to see it."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Social Security versus Military Spending 12 05 2024
Just some random thoughts. Probably shouldn't publish it. But what the hay.
I consider military spending to be the unconstitutional tax.
To dismantle social security as Republicans, seem to want to do...I would say that is synonymous with a desire that Americans are to live their whole lives in fear?
As an American were you ever afraid of being attacked by a foreign country? Not really, because you knew if it happened you would do what you had to do. And without a doubt you knew that you had God on your side.
So to dismantle Social Security, it is just an extension of Trickle-Down Economics isn't it! You only get what the decrepit nepotistic say you deserve. And if it means you are hungry and homeless at the time of retirement, somehow that is your own fault. Or perhaps you didn't have faith in God. Never mind that the rich who would be the ones to trickle down the money to you are never going to get into heaven; hence ungodly or condemned by God.
That makes it more of a mean world doesn't it. To say that so and so doesn't deserve anything even though they were able to learn and by all measures able to make the right of passage to manhood.
So a mean world is what Republicans want? Did you ever notice how that always boomerangs back at people who believe it? Perhaps because they truly don't know the meaning of “just.”
So all in all I believe that we have had an element in our Country that propagandizes high military spending while at the same time …
Do you know what that mean streak is? It is someone wanting to further justify their sense of greatness by making the declaration that those who are not rich are indeed inferior. I know it isn't true.
To me that mean streak seems in conflict with the evolution of the human race. Okay so you want to say you don't believe in evolution that you believe in God? It is also in conflict with Gods love for people.
But perhaps if Social Security were cut and or properly managed those who voted for it to be cut would be the ones who were disenfranchised the most. Aha! Now we are getting somewhere with this! A hidden Republican desire to cut social security in a manner so that those who should be disenfranchised are not! What do I mean? Basically, I believe the wealthy Republicans to be no good alcoholics that sire anxiety ridden children that can't learn or behave. Do you see that gestalt when they take the podium?
But what I am getting at is the magnitude of military spending versus Social Security spending. I would call military spending a sink hole. To propagandize the validity of it. And it is the largest employer. I don't know, it is like a black blob that wants to cover the entire country?
I really don't believe that Musk nor Vivek would have the means or resolve to audit Defense Spending. And as a member of the American public how do you see their actions with regard to it? They just write the check don't they! They have absolutely no problem just writing that check. But when it comes to paying teachers, they get so mad that they wet themselves?
When I hear a Republican wanting to destroy Social Security, I will tell you exactly what I think. That is specific identification of someone who wants Americans to live their who life in fear. I would argue that is how drug lord countries or exactly how organized crime ruins American neighborhoods.
And if Republicans can threaten Deportation of everyone, people they label bureaucrats I can make that statement.
They want the educable to pray to those with a damaged hippocampus for their daily bread.
Without naming names, what is the fury in their eyes really about? Hatred of America?
To me, the best deportations would be of those who want Americans to live in fear.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
how many people die of drunken driving every day in the us - Search
And you heard a politician play up a death caused by an immigrant given a light sentence.
And 13 soldiers who are paid to be in harms way died in the Afgan pullout.
how many died in the afganistan pullout - Search
I mean compare that to the 37 who die of drunken driving accidents every day and you tell me what is botched.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
It is like everything you want to put on your grocery list is being recalled for salmonella or E Coli.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"Well I don't know but if I would have a cup of coffee."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
In true Communism there is only generalized wealth, there is no individual wealth?
So Putin would seem to be an advocate of Communism. And yet he is extremely wealthy. So his own behavior disproves his belief system! And that is what I would call a nut and something to watch out for! Someone who doesn't know that their behavior disproves their belief system.
In other words they are lying to themselves? And they lie to themselves out of necessity? The biggest losers lie to themselves out of necessity in hopes that lie takes hold and they strike it rich by it?
So in true communism there is only generalized wealth. That downplays the idea of the individual to nothing. All are equivalent. And yet they strive to prove themselves amongst themselves athletically and in the Olympics.
As if a generalized equal person is really going to beat one of individual freedom?
Keep all babies because they are all the same? That general equivalency is true communism.
Anything you say bad about someone else is hate speech because we are all the same?
Just put all your faith in Jesus Christ because it is futile to attempt to think through a problem yourself?
A person who believes themselves to be generally equal does not need to poison his political opponents unless he knows that his belief in himself isn't really true?
If you are all generalized equal what purpose is there to compete with anyone? And here is the real kicker, if you believe yourself to be generalized equal when it comes time for you to compete you won't be able to compete fairly? Why? Because competition results in one level above that!
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Offering Solutions to Problems that Don't Exist 12 03 2024
How many gestalts of that can we see in our Country today?
And what does it indicate?
To offer a solution to a problem that doesn't exist really means that the person offering the solution is the problem?
It is a distraction from offering solutions to problems that do exist. Because those problems that do exist can be thought to contribute to the livlyhood of the individual or groups of individuals who would offer solutions to problems that don't exist.
And why would someone offer solutions to problems that don't exist? It is the science of psychology in business isn't it. It has to do with the prime method of marketing as being to create an urgent need in someone?
But is offering a solution to problems that don't exist really a way to hide unrecognized problems about yourself? Is there something about the individual or individuals who offer solutions that don't exist that can be stated to be “unrealized?” Unrealized meaning unknown to the general faithful public of a free democracy?
A Snoop would say it like this, “Look man this wine is the blood of Christ and you want to drink that!”
And Putins solution of War was a solution to what problem? He really couldn't articulate that could he. How many lives have been taken by a person who can't really articulate why he is going to war? Someone like that might be accurately labeled a mad man?
Again, you would offer solutions to problems that don't exist because you don't want to address the problems that do exist.
And why is it that you can't state what you specifically don't like? Because you know that if you stated what it is that you specifically didn't like absolutely everyone would come to the same conclusion that you are greatly flawed, and you would not be liked? But you would be liked by those of that same weakness and deceit wouldn't you!
Yep, I am going to boldy state it. Psychiatry is offering a solution to a problem that doesn't exist? No Psychiatry is offering a solution that is actively being created by all of the above.
“Doctor do you mean to tell me that I am somehow insulting myself? That that voice that is insulting me is really someone me insulting myself. And therefore I am so stupid that I don't know that if I just stopped insulting myself I would be fine? If I would stop somehow saying those jealous things to myself I would be fine. If I would just no longer envy myself I would be fine? No you are implying that there is absolutely no way for me to stop envying myself. That I jealously envy myself and there is absolutely no way for me to stop that?”
“Look man this wine is the blood of Christ and you want to drink that! And you want ta takes thems pills too.”
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
******'
Ps. Off topic. Does anybody know what Scott Walker was talking about when he talked about Teachers union mob bosses? He is indeed comparing our Public School System to organized crime? What basis did he have for destroying teachers unions in the first place? And from all indications the private voucher indicative costs taxpayers more and is less effective at education?
If somebody came up to you and said, "I have a voucher to you but I have to give it to you in private?" You would be right to be suspicious? Unless you believe you might be able to get pregnant from that whereas you would otherwise have less than zero hope for ever getting pregnant in your entire life?
Next Article
So the other night I read
So a man killed a Prostitute. And the lawyer states he found evidence on his phone that might prove him innocent?
Should the winners be hard to understand or should the losers be hard to understand?
It seems like the losers should be the hard ones to understand? They did something wrong that caused the loss. If they could really explain it then they might not have had the loss?
Perhaps the point of reference would be better stated like this, a losers behavior should be harder to understand? But if a winners behavior should be easy to understand then their would be more winners? Not necessarily for a loser can presume to be able to understand something fully and yet never be able to duplicate it. And perhaps that is the best definition of a loser?
But the winners should not be hard to understand. Now perhaps some winners are so practiced that their actions are "second nature" to them and therefore hard for them to explain, for they don't have to think about something in professionalism, and it is engrained in them. But what happens when they get distraction, do they still win, or if they lose can they then be more properly defined as really being a loser. "Why didn't you get that right?". Having to ask that question indicative of talking to a loser?
And what about what we might all agree to as being non winning behavior but instead of losing the non winning behavior is winning? And the winner can't explain it because they are really a loser?
In other words again, the real winners should be easy to understand. Either they can articulate professionalism or we understand it is unfaltering behavior in engraved in them.
Now I could digress and talk about the oddball that walked off the railroad tracks? Or perhaps start a paragraph about how non-deserving winners create an unsustainable democracy of the free. But why ruin everyone's day with those....
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Index finger poked out on my cell phone.
Auto complete really should be called Automatically Complete Incorrectly, ACI.
ACI gets the best of my one finger typing.
"If you could have chose not to; it means it is a matter of choice "
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
A device that allows for precision alignment and proper placement of fishing lure eyes on each side of a fishing lure.
You either are one and therefore you know the answer to that or you don't.
It is kind of like being in kindergarten when everyone is singing,
"If you are happy and you know it clap your hands."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
© Thomas Paul Murphy
It's seems like "television" in general supports the pro life movement.
But if that is true then it also needs to provide programs to help those who have to clean up the poop and put up with the foul cruel mouth on the end of it for 20 years how to cope and manage their lives better.
You would never believe in college that is the one skill you are going to need in adulthood. How to put up with a crude, greedy, foul mouthed people in the office.
And they want to say that you didn't develop socially in life and somehow you are equivalent to a mentally retarded person when you graduate from college because of that.
And those rotten soulless people read a diatribe like this and fall over backwards laughing in joy for the misery they cause as they siphon the money out of our country.
You know what else they should teach in grade school and college? How to cope with those jealous tormenting voices attempting to steal your soul once you have met all the requirements of right to passage into adulthood and honestly graduated from college. And the answer isn't you an adult male taking drugs that cause you to grow breast or elongate the qt interval of your heart Rythm.
"The best medicine we have for you will elongate the qt interval of your heart rhythm."
"Sir, would you like to video record me reading a statement like they made tortured American POW's read in Viet Name too?"
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
An Economic Political Administration Statistic: How many new Homeless were Created under an Administration? 11 30 2024
How come Academia never got on the ball with something like that?
Perhaps it would be the most relevant economic statistic related to a President, Governor or Mayors administration.
*****'
Perhaps it would completely disprove once and for all the validity of Reagonomics Trickle Down Economics?
Might ask yourself what years did the homeless (person or persons) become homeless in California?
And what specific policy caused that homelessness?
Was it related to sky high rents? Was it related to financial controls meant to protect the consumers that are needed, and needed to be enforced? Things your ausie born guy want to do away with? Not really in favor of something better. If you do away with a gov institution, do you have transition plans for its intended purpose?
When you hire someone who makes his living off of sky high rents what do you think you are going to expect from his years of political service?
Did you ever come to the conlcusion that those who vote for a person who is proposing hard line policies might be the ones who are negatively affected the most by it?
Perhaps those who vote pro life might find out they are going to have a completely miserable time in life because of that? Cleaning up poop for twenty years and putting up with a cruel and foul mouth on the other end of it?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
This sounds like how a weak minded political party thinks, "If you are smart enough to know what the problem is; it means you're the problem."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
I repost it here because Yahoo, MSFT or any of those sights seems to delete what I write and post there extremely quickly.
Musk is promising massive cuts in red tape. But Trump's agenda could add regulations elsewhere.
"In some form increased GDP is waste. For example pumping out more cars that are not built to last, it increases GDP, but it is really economic waste. You will never have keen minds in office that can ferret that aspect out of our economy. You will never have statistics that show the real cost of living. And that is what is needed. You will never have statistics that point out how much political spending is really just recycling of money. What is a recycled dollar worth to you, if not nothing?"
"Perhaps instead of tariffs on imports take a two prong approach on currency value. 1. Eliminate trading of currency. 2. Set the exchange rate to be how much an American who didn't speak "chinese" would have the price of goods they purchase marked up if they were visiting China. And use that same mechanism to set every currency exchange rate. And perhaps sent a person of color into a country that might be racist, and see how far their money goes. And disadvantage that foreign currency based on that."
Philosophy of Thought 11 28 2024
"You are better to overthink it and prune your way backwards than to underthink and not be able to go forwards."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"The same people whose children are coughing up a lung are writing award winning books on parenting."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
A Turbo V6 is a V6 with two expensive and failure prone parts that overwork the engine it to make it more like a V8???
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Who wants to hear all of those medicine side effects on drug television commercials when at that very moment they could be eating a pizza and watching TV.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
People that drive that dealers loaner car more so than the one they are having fixed at the dealer?
And did you ever ask yourself, “Why does that car they are selling as brand new have that many miles on it? 2000?”
“Sorry we don't have a loaner car to let you drive, they are all out and about right now.”
And what will it say when the loaner car they want to give you isn't' even of the brand they are selling?
******'
And here is another thing. All these places want you to believe that their is something wrong with you that you don't want to pay all that money to have frequent repairs for your car. As if you are some how poor! "Oh poor boy is here again." It has more to do with the aggravation of the constant repair experience. Rich people dump those lemons just as much as poor do. And I doubt you will be able to get a lemon law to work for you. You never see television lawyers advertise for it because there is no money in it. What you see them advertise heavily for are drunken driving car and motorcycle accidents. And I mean ultimately the good foot that bill as much as the bad in our country.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"I can put my oven to 405. I can put my oven to 410. But I can't put my oven to 409."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
draft article elements. perhaps more on it later.
1. Vein "The veins supply blood back to the heart."
2. Vain "Don't take the Lords name in vain." Don't speak as if you are of the vein of the Lord?
3. Vane "There is a vane of gold?" "The vanes of a windmill capture energy from the atmosphere and distribute it in the form of electricity?" The vain don't like it that the vanes of a windmill provide a vein of electricity?
The idea that they were all one word and that disambiguation was needed in order to obscure meanings that someone didn't like? The idea that disambiguation occurs because someone does't like the meaning of a word?
Enough to say that they are not of the same "Root" word? Roots being like the veins of a tree?
I don't know where I am going with this.
Create a Gun Control registry and then give it to an invading foreign country just like you did every other military secret we ever had?
So the Supreme Court just stuck down 9r17zk3r$ Gun Control initiative.
All well and good. But what about the meanwhile?
What happens when unconstitutional legislation is created in the meanwhile before it is struck down?
What am I getting at?
Someone is prosecuted and imprisoned and fined and persecuted by what is found to be an unconstitutional law?
When clearly most would say it was unconstitutional to begin with?
Shouldn't that person have fraud treble damage compensation coming back to them?
But who should pay for it you ask? To which I would reply, why should the public pay for it, when it clearly wasn't their representation to begin with?
And hence the persons who penned it should?
And should not the sentencing be what they had chosen the sentencing to be to other people?
But in order to maintain the structure of a constitutional democracy one could argue the sentencing must be greater. ~ for pushing through unconstitutional laws.
And what would the outcome of such an idea be?
More living in the standards of freedom?
And who among us doesn't believe in freedom?
And ooh list one might burn you to think about to?
Who believes that the standard of freedom is a false idealism? And who would have you believe that? Have you ever met one?
******'
Satire:
"Look here now. Now you see here. I have the bully pulpit now. I have all the money in the world. And I need you to know unequivocally that the standard of freedom is a false idealism."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
They only let their citizens have guns in war against countries that don't ~have gun control?
..."Well give you guns and send you off to fight that country that doesn't have gun control?"
In effect a country like that wants to be aggressive so that they can they create passivity?
So one could say the gestalt is an aggressive nation is aggressive because they can't compete in the world without leveling down human rights the world around?
When the threat to them is ingenuity created by freedom.
*****"
They are only gun control until their form of gov fails? And I wonder how many countries view war as a form of population control? How would you view the world if you had all the money in the world and could control people's lives? Because you had everything given to you you might be insanely jealous of the capabilities and intelligence of a normal person? You might loathe them like Satan did Jesus Christ?
*****"
You never see one a gun control country in a time of war say, we are going to abide by our gun control policy no matter if war or not? Because a country like that won't be one after a war. They will just be part of someone else's domain or in mass graves?
So in effect you have a power structure in a foreign country with gun control that only temporarily ditches gun control in times of war in order to maintain that power structure. So can it be called a country or does it more fit the term of a controlling power structure. To borrow words from our Constitution, not of the people or for the people.
Perhaps the best way to view foreign enemies of the US in war is a controlling power structure and it's people. But we seem to support the foreign power structures and perhaps the best terminology I have heard as to why is, we don't want to destabilize regions? Destabilize regions? Has a depth to it that needs explanation. And both you and I know we don't get a straight answer.
But for the first time in his life, when that foreign combatant from a gun control country is charging at us with his bayonet, what does he think he is? He thinks he is one of us doesn't he! For the first time in his life he believes himself to be free and he thinks he is one of us!
Now lets extract that concept. For the first time in a bad persons life, when they are attacking you, they believe themselves to be you and hence therefore they also believe themselves to be free. And we might then ask ourselves, what is it like for someone to live in a state of perdition like that? Does someone like that have a sense of purpose in life that could be defined as only proving themselves better through conflict? And that is an interesting belief system. Proving oneself through conflict.
Now lets expand that concept to the big picture again. Does the United States need to prove itself better through or rather initiating conflict? No for the sake of argument we say that the answer is flat out no. Then we might ask ourselves if there are people present here who disagree with a concept that seems to be consistent with our foundation?
Now let's throw in the term Independence. The idea that we are not independent if there are those here who want everyone here to prove themselves through conflict? Did you ever ask yourself who looks ten thousand years bc?
Round full circle with "destabilizing regions." Why doesn't that verbal mind believe that such countries are not stable to begin with? Aha! That persons belief system just revealed itself! That person (a she, Hillary?) considered such types of foreign govs to be stable? Then you ask yourself, if that person in question does not view a country like that to be de-stabile to begin with, how do they view us? Do you see? Where is their gradient of judgment? Now do you say, such a person lacks a gradient of judgement? Then you ask yourself, why does such a person lack a gradient of judgement? To put it simply, why don't they view our country, the people of our country, as better? Better for living in freedom? Better for abiding by the principle and respect for living in freedom? You would doubt that if you couldn't be it?
And philosophically a conclusion might be, someone doubts what they can't comprehend? Now have you ever found that to be a source of conflict in your life? Perhaps personal or work life? Someone you can easily see doubts a great many things because they have very shallow and vain comprehension? And so you take it in stride. Because your above it. Conflict with it can only level you down.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Off topic?
So will Trump take on the cause of gun control and use the fact that someone tried to shoot him as all the simple justification he needs to do do? That would seem to fit a patterning of blunt deceit?
Off topic. Not relevant.
You know what it's like? You work for an @$$h0le long enough and you're going to hear the $h17 that's going to come out of their mouth long before they say it. And you have to put up with that fuming envy for the rest of your life.
If you going to push for that then why not also push for a national holiday where we celebrate all of our sick?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"At some point you are not going to like your new criminal friends."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Do you know what Elon and Vivek are going to find when (if?) they audit the DOD budget?
They are going to find, "the people that fell through the he cracks."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
I don't know, anybody want to say anything as to why those three words are often used together?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
I heard that somewhere recently. Haven't fact checked it.
But what does it mean? It means that the largest employer in the United States is on the public dole!
Should I compare that to communism where every citizen is on the public dole?
What if I would say that the Defense Industry therefore competes for United States dollars with United States Citizens and those disabled in the workforce that are on Social Security? What would that mean to you? Does it seem like a relevant point or just some nebulous comparison to you?
Did you know that our Constitution forbids us from having a standing army in times of peace?
*****'
So there is or was the promotion of cigarettes through advertising. The promotion of alcohol labels through advertising, on television today.
When the Department of Defense (Industry) advertises what does that mean? What does it mean the promotion of? To promote conflict to further a business and profits just like A&T advertises to ensure the use and addiction of their products?
Have there been false flag events in the Unites States created perhaps by the CIA that makes the US. Citizen say we need to spend more on defense and intelligence?
Ooh, "Spend more on intelligence?" Is it really something that you can buy with money if you don't have it yourself? Think about it.
What do we need in this country? Perhaps all we need is a wall. Perhaps a working Navy. And perhaps those that don't agree with it belong on the other side of that wall? He, he, they can take their money and buy intelligence there?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
But somehow DOD fits very nicely with the wealth status maintaining that quota and preventing people from becoming rich, a barrier to upward mobility and is also fits very well with legalized alcohol. Perhaps your life is ruined by the time high school rolls around for you because of alcohol use and it provides a place for skill learning. In hopes that you can apply those skills to afford a family when you get out? A family business only hires family? A tight knit org only hires people that are dumber than themselves? That is indeed what Trump said, not to hire anyone smarter than yourself. So you have a very wealthy person there who could employ people, you get your college education and developed yourself, and bingo they advocate not to hire you! Why not? I'll tell you why! You are not going to like them and they are not going to like you! And indeed I have Jesus Christ on my side with regards to the rich. Always remember that. Jesus Christ is on your side with regard to the rich being bad.
I need a plan to convert a used wiper blade into a handled squeegee.
Basically how to engineer a durable connection between the wiper and a broomstick handle.
I want it to be non-marring.
Found a "grabber" with broken clasps. Drilled a hole through wiper blade. Used a bolt with two nylon washers. It will hold for a little while
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Bad Media will not ask a bad person something that they do not want to talk about, but it will always be! He first question they pose to a good person.
And vice versa.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
That would be a great name for a political party.
It has do with a hidden aspect of the wealthy not wanting certain people to be mobile.
And a brief explanation might be this. A Social Worker told me that they had mentors for ba to kids but as soon as they were separated the kid went right back to bring bad. Mentors who are serving against the heir will as chosen fathers?
But in case you haven't noticed your gasoline engine with an infrastructure for unlimited range is being replaced by inflated priced we electric cars with limited range. Decreased mobility.
And what is in the green structures located near the charging stations? Are they natural gas based generators?
But the motivation has been there all throughout history the o decrease the mobility of those with a good natural mind? Because once that person puts some distance between themselves and those who are suckling dependent upon it the bad revert to being the bad. Perhaps the Bible refers to them as yowsabouts or the miserable losers ones who are still with us.
The Mobility Political Party would seek to ensure theo mobility of those who are not the miserable ones who are still with us. With perhaps an unrecognized goal being that the miserable ones who are still with us fade away.
And perhaps the real Kennedy stated it best with regards to eliminating Communism in our country, "...man will be what he was meant to be, free and independent."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
"Motivating the former rich to do good after wealth redistribution."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
A bad manager is one who can't manage the employees he (she?) got straight out of the pumpkin field, unless he (she?) instills them with a sense of war against the customer.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
The doughnut sized spare.
So if it is the dead of winter and you are taking Grandmother to the Christmas Dinner and you get a flat in the middle of a 90 mile trip what is going to happen?
She is going to get pneumonia because you won't be able to drive very well on that crap spare?
Or your wife is making the same trip and then has to use the back roads home through every drunken hick town there is?
I mean talk about Republicans taking away women's rights. How come they don't think of women the way that is implied here? Some harvest witch whore money maker to them? A marriage their drunken mothers made at a health club? Who knows.
But we got to put up with them for 4 years. And they are going to do as much damage as they possibly can. And feed off the God D@mned misery they create.
I haven't spoken about the election results yet because I am so gd pissed.
But I will tell you one thing. I know of a die hard life time Republican. This man was an Eagle Scout! He can't stand Trump. Didn't vote for him. Say's everything that he says is a lie.
So there is hope.
And what can we do about Trump? We just have to have faith in God that he will do the right things. That is all we can do. He has a stacked Supreme Court and is filling cabinet positions with G@d awful people. All we can do is have faith in God. I have written about when I saw things wrong as best as I could. I am mostly giving up about writing about him and them. I just have to have faith in God at this point. And do you want to know something? Isn't that a terrible thing? To have such a bumbling leader that you have to pray for them? To have to pray for your leader. Does that mean the leader is strong or weak in your opinion. It means they are weak when you have to pray for them.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy