Ex Post Facto Laws and Bloomberg 04 17 2021
Ex Post Facto Laws are Unconstitutional. It means you can't make something illegal that is legal.
All Gun Control laws are blatantly Unconstitutional. But Bloomberg had no problem with the most egregious ex post facto laws regarding them.
But when it came to pot legalization? What did he state? He stated that the cat is out of the bag on that one. Meaning that an ex post facto law can't be created because it was legalized on the state level? I am not sure that is true. Not if it was always illegal at the Federal level.
Federal Law versus Constitutional Law? One would think that when Federal Laws are created someone with a bookkeeper mentality would be looking at the Constitution in order to see if they are compliant with it? And you can't have someone who is subjectively willful doing that like K. Harris. Otherwise it is less than meaningless.
But don't worry Life Guard Joe Biden will be there to save you when you are walking alone on that dark street late at night on your way home from a job that won't even pay the rent. Least of all your American family.
Great concept isn't it? Does this pairing intend to create an American family? What are we led to believe an American family is today? Any pairing of drunks, soon to be a single parent drunk with one or more emotionally disturbed problem children? Somehow I don't think that qualifies?
© 2021 Thomas Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment