How can Joe say (and believe?) that and then not pardon his son?
And legally what does it mean that Joe contended his son did nothing wrong and then his son was convicted? Did Joe bear false witness? Did Joe misrepresent a material fact? If this line of questioning holds up the next question would be: At what time did Joe know the truth in relation to him contending his son did nothing wrong?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment