Mathew 12:43 and Schizophrenia 06 26 2025
The Return of the Unclean Spirit NABRE
“When an unclean spirit goes out of a person it roams through arid regions searching for rest but finds none. Then it says, “I will return to my home from which I came.” But upon returning, it finds it empty, swept clean, and put back in order. Then it goes and brings back with itself seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they move in and dwell there; and the last condition of the person is worse thant the first. Thus it will be with this evil generation.”
Implies wealth? For it were the serveants who put everything back in order?
Home? Implies a person.
Dwell there.
Person is highlighted. Why? Because the unclean spirit is a person. The demon is a person.
And the Bible also tells us what those spirits sounded like when Jesus cast them out of a person who was made sick by them.
The New Testament KJV King James Version (KJV was first published in 1611)
When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places seeking rest, and findeth none.
Then he saitheth I will return to my from whence I came out; and when he is come he findeth it empty swept and garnished.
Then he goeth he, and taketh with himself seven more spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation.
Catch and kill! It is Hobeken grammer.
You see, the King James Version is stating that the unclean spirit IS the man. Whereas the NABRE version is calling the unclean spirit and it, and there is an implied detachment between the eclean spirit and the “person” who was posssessed by it. Very big difference.
The King James Version is a Catch, change and kill of the words of Jesus Christ! And look at the grammar of the King James version in comparison to the Catholic Bible. The King James Version is horrible grammar! And it isn't horrible because it is old English, it would be horrible even considering it is old English. In comparison to todays terms it is like someone with a 3rd grade education wrote it. Or better yet, parapharised it, in a misleading and fraudulent manner in plagerism. Bingo!
So what was the original text of Matthew? The erliest version is dated to the late Second and Early Third Century. 1100 years before the KJV.
Per Google:
When did the gospel of Matthew originate?
The events described in Matthew take place in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and the surrounding occupied lands of the Greco-Roman Empire during the early 1st century, between 10 B.C.E. and 40 C.E. The book was likely composed between 50 and 90 C.E.
Feb 15, 2019 — This means that P52, the earliest New Testament manuscript, was likely copied within 100 years or so of the original.
People also ask
What is the earliest copy of the New Testament?
The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear around 200, and the earliest complete copy of the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus, dates to the 4th century.
I kid you not. I found the earliest version I could. About 200 ad. And the text of that was translated to what the KJV says. However when I ran that same odd letter text through Google translator I got this.
43And when the uncleanness that cometh out of the anus passeth through dry places, seeking rest, and finding none, he saith, Let me go into my house: from hence I came out, and when I came, I found him lying and weeping. and then you go and take with you seven other sins worse than yourself, and you are coming and living there. And you have become the curse of the first generation, so you are also this generation.
43ρκθ
ε
οταν δε το ακαθαρ
τον πνα εξελθη
απο του ανου διερ
χετε δι ανυδρων
τοπων ζητουν
αναπαυϲιν και ου
44
χ ευριϲκει τοτε
λεγι ειϲ τον οικο
μου επιϲτρεψω
οθεν εξηλθον κ(αι) ελ
θον ευριϲκει ϲχο
λαζοντα και ϲεϲα
ρωμενον και κε
κοϲμημενον
45
τοτε πορευετε κ(αι)
παραλαμβανι με
θ εαυτου επτα ετε
ρα πνατα πονηρο
τερα εαυτου και ειϲ
ελθοντα κατοι
κι εκι και γινετε
τα εϲχατα του ανου
εκινου χιρονα
των πρωτων
ουτωϲ εϲτε και
τη γενεα ταυτη
46ρλ1
In the Google translation of the most original text I could locate, the Demon is implied to be a homosexual? Or perhaps to be more accurate the demon came from a homosexual.
You know, that is pretty profound isn't it?
No comments:
Post a Comment