An Interesting Concept that might help
prevent overeating 01 11 2018
Water has no Calories.
https://www.google.com/search?q=water+has+no+calories&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab
"How is a Calorie Defined? The
energy needed to increase the temperature of a given mass of water by
1 °C depends....."
Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie
But what is water? Water is Two Parts
Hydrogen to one Part Oxygen.
So if you take a cup of water how much
oxygen is in it if you split the Hydrogen and Oxygen?
And if you take a cup of water how much
hydrogen is in it if you split the hydrogen and Oxygen?
What is the point? Oxygen is highly
flammable if not explosive. So it does indeed contain calories?
Because you can burn it to create energy. ( I am wrong about this
paragraph even though I am right about it.)
What about hydrogen? Hydrogen is
flammable too. So if you split the hydrogen from the oxygen in a cup
of water how many calories are in that amount of hydrogen?
Now add those two up and ask yourself
how many calories total that is.
You could potentially go 21 days
without eating food and only drinking water. Perhaps you could 3 days
without water perhaps 8 to 10.
But do the math there.
Now how many calories are there in the
hydrogen and oxygen in 8 ounces of water?
But wait calories are defined as the
energy released when something combines with oxygen? So is there a
loophole that Oxygen the standard of measure capable or producing
energy... You get the point don't you? It looks to me like bad basis
science in some way? Bad premise science?
So oxygen isn't flammable per the
definition of it. But is it really a valid definition? Is that really
how one should think of oxygen? Oxygen isn't really present in the
world unless it is near something else. So there is a co-factor
element to this? Oxygen makes other things burn at a lower
temperature, ignite and burn faster. So lets say you have a canister
of oxygen in a hospital and it leaks. Even though it say's danger of
explosion. You run around and tell everyone that oxygen isn't
flammable? Because you are so proud of your chemistry degree? Now
that would make a great scene in a movie.
So moving on. If oxygen isn't flammable
but hydrogen is? The definition of hydrogen is that it is flammable.
Okay see where I am going now? You take hydrogen gas and add oxygen
gas which makes it burn hotter and therefore is creating more energy
and therefore has more calories because that torch could heat a cup
of water.
So lets see where I want to go with
this now. Do you urinate the same amount of water as you intake? If
not what happened to it? Lets say that is true. What happened to
that? It was stored in body tissue? Is there a ratio?
But back to my point. So I really don't
know. But if you start burning hydrogen gas and add oxygen to it,
what you get.
But back to my point. So I really don't
know. But if you start burning hydrogen gas and add oxygen to it,
what you get.
When a fuel cell is provided with
hydrogen and oxygen it creates electricity and the byproduct is
water.
And there is such a thing as a
OXYHYDROGEN TORCH (cutting torch) where the gas is H2O2.
And apparently there is such a thing as
an HHO torch that burns very hot and produces Water!
What am I getting at? I don't know.
Perhaps some metaphysical something. And you have to realize that
the person who is writing this has had virtually every thought and
memory in their head beaten out of existence for the last 27 years.
But assuming the HHO torch idea and you
could somehow make one by converting the gas from the amount of
hydrogen and oxygen in a cup of water and the byproduct of that torch
would be water....
Somehow I think I made a point here.
Might be something that needs to be discovered with regard to it?
What inspired this? I am getting
heartburn and think if I eat less it will go away. Perhaps the
esophagus expands from overeating, because weaker as it gets thinner
just like the skin of a balloon becomes thinner when it expands. And
it might shrink if I eat less or don't overeat. And then it might go
away. More acid is produced when you overeat and that becomes a
constant everyday, and it eats away at the esophagus and causes
heartburn?
My body is telling me to drink water
and eat less.
Copyright 2018 Thomas Murphy
And I don't really want to here some
jackhole Highs School professor who bragged about hitting a student
with the energy from a Tesla Coil try to explain any of this to me.
You have no credibility with me and you never will have.
Not done yet. According to this you
could make oxygen just by itself explode if you heated it up in a
chamber past its critical pressure point.
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/is-pure-oxygen-flammable.1824524/
Doesn't that mean it is flammable?
Which brings me to what? Redefining
how a Calorie is defined?
Just take a good look at who the
chemists are in our nation and what their priority is, it isn't human
health! It is money.
Now here is my last point. My
Whitefish Bay High School Chemistry Teacher was fat and bitchy. She
said that she was a finalist candidate to go up on the space shuttle.
One student asked her a question I wanted to ask but I didn't feel
like getting bitched at. She drank diet soda left and right. He
asked her why they put so many chemicals in it. To which she loudly
bitched, “Because it is good for you!” She died of, a heart
attack?, a few years later. So what is the point? Science really
being the opportunity for the mal adjusted to arrogantly lose
themselves in academia with little regard or connection to humanity.
And a lot of it stems from proposing solutions to problems that they
created in the first place? So what is that? Someone that doesn't
belong here necessitating themselves? “You need me to solve the
last problem that I created for everyone?” I don't need you at
all. You could stay in your four walls and not be allowed to have
any contact with the outside world at all for all I care! But would
you end up reacting with yourself? And I could tell you stories
about other people that were like that too.
One final point to consider. You can
not burn something without oxygen. And yet oxygen isn't flammable?
Perhaps one of two things are going on here. Either the terminology
doesn't do justice to the science. Or...
It isn't just a play on words is it.
And oxygen is formed through
photosynthesis breaking down carbon dioxide? Is that a fare
statement? No. If you think of it that way then you could not have
a universe without life creating it. So indeed per my dead skull
memory I had the construct that all the elements were just spewed out
of the big bang.
Does science really accurately explain
how we can get something from nothing?
The only thing that explains how you
can get something from nothing is the concept of the “Holy Spirit?”
And one of my Fathers favorite sayings
was, “Am I being or becoming?”
Do you believe that you have a Holy
Spirit or do you believe that you don't have your own Holy Spirit?
Copyright 2018 Thomas Murphy
More theory here. So you take oxygen and you heat it in a container until it reaches a critical pressure and explodes and it comes into contact with other oxygen. What is flammable the container? And if you somehow made the container out of oxygen form in some novel way...
And it turns out there is such a thing as solid oxygen. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-ab&ei=ZxdYWo75O8O4zwL4iLjIDw&q=solid+oxygen&oq=solid+oxygen&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.797175.799102.0.799348.12.9.0.3.3.0.120.867.6j3.9.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.12.889...46j0i67k1j0i46i67k1j46i67k1j0i131k1j0i46k1j0i131i67k1.0.aUYLg8z_meE
But you would have to cool it to get it so you could heat oxygen inside of it fast enough to reach the critical pressure? But what if in some way you could? If somehow you could do that very fast? There are indeed thresholds like that in science. And they seem to defy science? Until science comes up for an explanation of them? Science is as much bunk as the voices in my head are! No more legitimate than that!
More theory here. So you take oxygen and you heat it in a container until it reaches a critical pressure and explodes and it comes into contact with other oxygen. What is flammable the container? And if you somehow made the container out of oxygen form in some novel way...
And it turns out there is such a thing as solid oxygen. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-ab&ei=ZxdYWo75O8O4zwL4iLjIDw&q=solid+oxygen&oq=solid+oxygen&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.797175.799102.0.799348.12.9.0.3.3.0.120.867.6j3.9.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.12.889...46j0i67k1j0i46i67k1j46i67k1j0i131k1j0i46k1j0i131i67k1.0.aUYLg8z_meE
But you would have to cool it to get it so you could heat oxygen inside of it fast enough to reach the critical pressure? But what if in some way you could? If somehow you could do that very fast? There are indeed thresholds like that in science. And they seem to defy science? Until science comes up for an explanation of them? Science is as much bunk as the voices in my head are! No more legitimate than that!
So Solid Oxygen is sky blue in color because it absorbs the red part of the visible light spectrum. Now right there I find that very interesting, profoundly so. The red part of the visible light spectrum being part of the color scheme of flames? https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-ab&ei=ZxdYWo75O8O4zwL4iLjIDw&q=solid+oxygen&oq=solid+oxygen&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.797175.799102.0.799348.12.9.0.3.3.0.120.867.6j3.9.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.12.889...46j0i67k1j0i46i67k1j46i67k1j0i131k1j0i46k1j0i131i67k1.0.aUYLg8z_meE It absorbs the Low Frequency Spectrum and reflects the high frequency spectrum. Might that mean it has an "affinity" for the low frequency spectrum?
ReplyDeleteAnd do not your red colored foods have more antioxidant capability? Do you see how that logically plays out? They reflect the low frequency spectrum? Does that mean that they absorb the high frequency spectrum? So whatever reflects the low frequency spectrum, is colored red, that red protects it from the low frequency spectrum? And it also protects you from oxidative free radical damage when you eat it. So if you have blue eyes that means your eyes absorb the low frequency spectrum just like solid oxygen does? :) It means you are therefore an accelerant? And yet like Daniel of the Bible story, as well as oxygen you are incapable or less capable of being burned yourself. But you sure help others burn extremely quickly? :)
ReplyDeleteBut that neither seems true nor fair. It is more fair to say that they had a higher propensity for burning up when they came into your presence. Which means they are defective. So its not your fault. Even though nothing can burn without oxygen. :) But that which can live without oxygen is classified as a vegetable that makes it? So the vegetable makes it for your absorption. That is the sole purpose of the vegetable. https://www.google.com/search?q=what+can+live+without+oxygen&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab
ReplyDelete