Does it make it easier to be Judge without a death penalty?
It works in favor of Organized Crime too? Your pawns don't get angry if they know they won't be put to death? More likely to sign up to organized crime?
But the judges during Prohibition would not touch bootleggers? They were untouchable?
So I have to wonder if the reason we don't have the death penalty is because Judge who used it would fear retribution or assassination?
My personal opinion, a lot of crimes I see on the news should beat that sentence.
I also believe if you can free a man but take away his Constitutional Right to have a gun, then you could also choose other rights they are not allowed to have?
In terms recidivism we might benefit greater as a country if they were denied ability to purchase alcohol. But to do that you need a specific alcohol id card or that aspect integral to drivers license or state id.
You don't really learn how alcohol mal-influenced your life until you have stopped drinking for 10 or 20 years. I would say the moment you took that first drink some of your freedom was gone, in terms of how you could have experienced life more truly without it.
If we can take away your right to a gun open freeing you can we also take away your right to be religious? After all what good did your religion do in preventing from Committing the as to crime? Yeah, I am serious.
If we can take away one Constitutional Right can't we also report you; take away your right to be here?
The bottom line is that if we free you does it really matter what right we take away if we can determine we can take away a right like we do?
Just trying to make the country a safer place for good people.
Personally I believe, if you are free it means all Constitutional Rights. And that to teeters the scales of justice to more certainty, responsibility to the people and implementation of the death penalty.
© 2023 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment