"When one group defining themselves a certain way redefines what it means to be one of us? And I don't agree with the resultant definition of what it means to be one of us."
Do you follow that?
In other words in order for you to define yourselves as being that it really changes the meaning of what it means to be one of us. And I don't agree with that changed meaning.
Your defining yourselves a certain way encroaches on the meaning of what it means to be one of us. It lessens that meaning? Or lessens the standard. And you lessen that standard enough and we are all gone. Gave up everything for a lesser form of government. One that bears false witness against man.
******'
And the issue can also be seen like this.
Any problems that you have...you do not step up in responsibility in any way and say that they are "your" own fault. And that then really defers to it being the fault of the United States Constitution. And those problems are in no way shape or form caused by our United States Constitution. It should almost be considered a holy document that set and spread the example of free people around the world. But you, you take issue with this, you don't get that.
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment