Learning and the stream of Consciousness or Conscience? 06 09 2019
Sure that is a disambiguated word?
But here is really what this one is about:
Once a person learns the reasons in order as to why they should not do something should they have to remember all of those premises?
Lets say that an individual learns that if ten steps of action are taken in this order that such and such will happen. Should that person always remember those ten steps? No.
Are you following me yet? Should you have to explain to someone with a disordered mind why they shouldn't do something? It is an exercise in futility isn't it! And someone might use the terminology that person is not on the same wavelength? When wavelength really has nothing to do with it does it?
That phrase would imply that all ten steps are inherent in one brain wavelength? Can never be that way can it. Because your memories are different from everyone else's. We are not made like cookie cutters.
So why do we learn? So that we can do things faster smarter.
Okay lets say that someone tries to trip you up, They think that they are getting really cute. And they seek to defy step number 6. Believing that you no longer remember its importance as to step number 10?
It really doesn't matter does it? Because steps number one through 6 are their own construct. You had to learn them first and plateaued at that point, even if briefly before you could get to step 7?
Following this at all? It has to do with the futility of being an idiot?
© 2019 Thomas Murphy
It also debunks those who claim to have knowledge without learning? An articulation of an important difference between people?
And wait a minute. You explain something to someone and they form a single image of it in their memory. However that construct is invalid in many ways. Why? 1. Because it isn't premise based. 2. It likely has its origin of understanding via a verbal connectivity viewpoint rather than cause/ effect, spatial relations, mechanics?
Am I indeed talking about the archetype Vineyard owner in the Bible?
When I read this Bible search on vineyards I have to ask the question. Was the purpose of a Good Shephard to take his sheep to the vineyard in order to destroy it?
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Vineyard
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Destroying-Vineyards
Sure that is a disambiguated word?
But here is really what this one is about:
Once a person learns the reasons in order as to why they should not do something should they have to remember all of those premises?
Lets say that an individual learns that if ten steps of action are taken in this order that such and such will happen. Should that person always remember those ten steps? No.
Are you following me yet? Should you have to explain to someone with a disordered mind why they shouldn't do something? It is an exercise in futility isn't it! And someone might use the terminology that person is not on the same wavelength? When wavelength really has nothing to do with it does it?
That phrase would imply that all ten steps are inherent in one brain wavelength? Can never be that way can it. Because your memories are different from everyone else's. We are not made like cookie cutters.
So why do we learn? So that we can do things faster smarter.
Okay lets say that someone tries to trip you up, They think that they are getting really cute. And they seek to defy step number 6. Believing that you no longer remember its importance as to step number 10?
It really doesn't matter does it? Because steps number one through 6 are their own construct. You had to learn them first and plateaued at that point, even if briefly before you could get to step 7?
Following this at all? It has to do with the futility of being an idiot?
© 2019 Thomas Murphy
It also debunks those who claim to have knowledge without learning? An articulation of an important difference between people?
And wait a minute. You explain something to someone and they form a single image of it in their memory. However that construct is invalid in many ways. Why? 1. Because it isn't premise based. 2. It likely has its origin of understanding via a verbal connectivity viewpoint rather than cause/ effect, spatial relations, mechanics?
Am I indeed talking about the archetype Vineyard owner in the Bible?
When I read this Bible search on vineyards I have to ask the question. Was the purpose of a Good Shephard to take his sheep to the vineyard in order to destroy it?
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Vineyard
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Destroying-Vineyards
No comments:
Post a Comment