Who was sent to Australia 03 30 2021

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=who+was+sent+to+australia

 Per Wikipedia

"Between 1788 and 1868, about 162,000 convicts were transported from Britain and Ireland to various penal colonies in Australia. The British Government began transporting convicts overseas to American colonies in the early 18th century."

 

I am not sure I understand this?  Seems misleading to me?  As if the British and Irish Governments worked in concert to do this?  

 

Cromwell who victimized the Irish was 1599-1658.

(Incident-ley do the Irish living in England have a right to protest statues of him?)

And when was the Potato famine? 1845-1852.

So 1788-1868.

U.S. founded July 4th 1776.

U.S. Revolutionary War. 1775-1783

So it looks like Great Britain dumped their criminals in American Colonies 5 years after the end of the Revolutionary War where we gained our Independence from them?

Now lets contrast this to slavery in the United States.  It started to really pick up from 1751 to 1775.

 

1726–1750	34,004
1751–1775	84,580
1776–1800	67,443
1801–1825	109,545

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_United_States

So I don't get it.  You had British Criminals coming here and also Slaves coming here at the exact same time period?

 

Then the Civil War 1861-1865.  And the British helped the South.

 

So a question is.  Did some of those British Criminals sent here establish Slave Plantations?  It is consistent with the mean will of a criminal to be slave master?  But then the British tried to help them in the Civil War.

 

Something isn't adding up here right. 

© 2021 Thomas Murphy

Would we know it if a homeless person was sent to work in a factory in China?  Whisked away behind a van somewhere?  We don't even know what happened to Vietnam MIA's.

 

*****'

Off topic.  The British Control the Suez Canal.

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=does+britain+control+the+suez+canal&safe=active&client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=ALeKk03L_fb4IGyM08z5G9sP8gFngy8_Rg%3A1617160886833&ei=tupjYJ6kMpLctAaVyYWYDw&oq=does+britain+control+the+suez+canal&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyAggAMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeMgUIABCGAzIFCAAQhgMyBQgAEIYDMgUIABCGAzoHCAAQRxCwAzoECCMQJzoFCAAQkQI6CwguELEDEMcBEKMCOggIABCxAxCDAToECC4QQzoFCAAQsQM6CggAELEDEIMBEEM6DQguELEDEMcBEKMCEEM6BwguELEDEEM6BAgAEEM6BQgAEMkDOgcIABCHAhAUOggIIRAWEB0QHjoECAAQDVCq0wNY-I8EYM6RBGgEcAJ4AIABqgGIAbkXkgEEMzcuMpgBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXrIAQjAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz&ved=0ahUKEwie19DhydnvAhUSLs0KHZVkAfMQ4dUDCAw&uact=5

 

When you think about the United States involvement in the War in Iraq.  And the War in the Middle East.  And then you think, the British controlled the Suez Canal all that time?  The British own the Canal and it goes through Egypt?

 

When you think about arms flow?  Troop flow? Who is on what side and for what reason?

Something doesn't add up here.

How much does it cost to pass through the Suez Canal?

Per Google Search: 

"What is the cost of using the Suez Canal?

Around 8% of world sea trade is carried via the canal. In 2008, 21,415 vessels passed through the canal and the receipts totaled $5.381 billion, with an average cost per ship of $251,000."

 

That was 13 years ago.

 

To charge people for using a canal that runs through another country?

It would be like a foreign country charging fees and earning money from people using the Mississippi River?

 

How is it determined how much a ship should pay?

 

Per Google Search : 

 

"Tolls for the Suez Canal transit are assessed on SCNT. The toll rates are determined on the basis of SDR units. Tolls calculated on this basis are payable in one of designated hard currencies according to its exchange rate in relation to SDRs declared by the IMF."

 

 

And I can not validate that any of the above facts and figures are correct.

 

But SCNT doesn't mean this!

 

"

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), technique in which the nucleus of a somatic (body) cell is transferred to the cytoplasm of an enucleated egg (an egg that has had its own nucleus removed).Feb 7, 2021"

 

Don't you hate it when an acronym has more than one very different meanings?

 

It means this per Google:

 

"Suez Canal Net Tonnage (SCNT) is derived with a number of modifications from the former net register tonnage of the Moorsom System and was established by the International Commission of Constantinople in its Protocol of 18 December 1873."

So when you see how many inter-modal carriers on the ship that was stuck in the canal.  How much was that ship or a ship like that paying to use the canal?

The Ever Given is the name of the ship.  It is worth perhaps $100 million whereas the Cargo on it was worth $500 million.  per google search results.

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+much+was+the+ever+given+paying+to+use+the+suez+canal&safe=active&client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=ALeKk00APn_1NJTDMRWt0RZLukLrdEZkuw%3A1617162061903&ei=Te9jYJ-6NozdtQbJo5DAAg&oq=how+much+was+the+ever+given+paying+to+use+the+suez+canal&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6BwgAEEcQsANQxdIBWIvzAWCx9QFoBHACeACAAboCiAH2G5IBCDEzLjQuNi4ymAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpesgBCMABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz&ved=0ahUKEwjflPmRztnvAhWMbs0KHckRBCgQ4dUDCAw&uact=5 

Makes one never want to have to pay another boat ramp fee again in their life in the United States.

© 2021 Thomas Murphy

And it brings up another point.  About fees being earned in the United States or from United States Citizens being transferred overseas!

Look at the issue of international banking!  Foreign banks should just not exist in the United States.  Why not?  Because perhaps if they didn't you would earn interest on your United States dollars again?  Get it?  See why?