If I were President, I would mandate that the Police Force be zero percent alcoholics.
Is there a legal basis to do that?
If you can't drive while drunk, I believe that is enough of a legal basis to say that you can't be an officer of the court if you are an alcoholic.
If you can get fired for any job if you come into work inebriated, I think the standard of the court system should be that you can't be an alcoholic to be a part of it.
I believe that this would transition our country to better leadership, less crime, less corruption.
They say that an alcoholic is only impaired for a few hours after drinking? That isn't true is it? If it were true they would not be impaired to be addicted. They wouldn't need to come back to that substance. They wouldn't be impaired to the point that they need to come back to a substance. And the substance is a substitute for a valid and legal reward system.
Perhaps there are two types of people in this world. One has a valid and legal reward system and the other doesn't.
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
In summary, an alcoholic is always under the influence of alcohol otherwise they would not keep coming back to it in addiction. They are always under the influence of alcohol.
Can an alcoholic become not an alcoholic? In some cases. But only if they hate it. So indeed we need to teach people in our country to hate alcohol, not aggrandize it. Sure, I know, this doesn't go over to well.
No comments:
Post a Comment