Native American Horror 03 31 2019
What is this article about? It is about forms of "Government" whereby the women and children are too traumatized from seeing horror to live free lives.
Let's say a Native American woman saw a man being scalped? Lets say it was her son scalped by a member of a combative tribe? A person like that either has two choices?
1. Become the horror.
2. live a life in apathetic shock.
******'
Off topic.
When I read about descendants of slavery asking for compensation I think, what about Americans who lost family members in the Civil War on the Union side to end it? Do you hear Union family members who lost relatives long ago crying about it?
Americans also lost lives ending that savage Native American rule.
********'
Are there countries and Governments that exist today whereby the leadership traumatizes the people?
India Indians Magistrate gang raping young women.
And the list could go on and on.
But what happens when the justice system is lenient on drugs and a nonworking class emerges that likes to use them. They don't attain happiness from achievement but rather from drug use. Are a people like that likely to destroy the works of man and commit acts of violence and horror against them? I would say yes.
Do we have neighborhoods in the United States where that is rampant? In the inner city?
Shouldn't non inner city victims of inner city violence be compensated from it? But you can't take what someone else doesn't have and give it to someone else; because there is nothing to take! Remember? The person using drugs does not work to attain happiness.
Ever go into a workplace and see that what makes the employees most happy is what might be termed an apathetic or odd reaction to the customer? What fosters that? What group behavior is being promoted? Is it in the best interest of the American Public and our Constitution?
Justice needs to be to the point whereby a people are not living traumatized in perpetuity in their own communities.
© 2019 Thomas Murphy
Okay the next part was supposed to be a separate article but I am going to tack it on right here.
On Violence: Defending yourself against a known genetic freak.
I view violence as being started by the freaks amount us, they pushed someone too far.
It is not fair that the person that defends themselves, against what could be termed a known genetic freak, ever has to plead the insanity defense.
We would never have been the country the Founding Fathers founded if violent acts in self defense, even non immediate were not justified.
The legal precedent of today denies the fact that there exists horrible and creepy people in this world.
~ A man in Northern Wisconsin kidnaps a girl for 80 days. 1 week before that he was the same man as that right? What if he started a fight with someone 1 week before he was to kidnap that girl and that someone had killed him with his bare hands? Whatever the legal process is that person should not end up in jail or even be charged in my humble opinion.
Defending yourself against what could be termed a "Known genetic freak"...
So what type of plan could be legislated?
Phase 1: They are created by alcohol and drugs. Hence that needs to be abolished.
Phase 2: To be implemented over a period of 10 years. It is not fair for parole officers to be able to track them but general members of the public not being able to readily identify them. Identification and labeling. It would be the best way to decrease the negative influence television is having on the American Public. Only a mother of a beast would vehemently object. And specific identification criteria can not be allowed to be made by todays ruling class.
Why? It has to do with this profound assertion by me.
"Do you understand that if we did what we would have to do to please you that there would not be a single human being left on earth."
What is this article about? It is about forms of "Government" whereby the women and children are too traumatized from seeing horror to live free lives.
Let's say a Native American woman saw a man being scalped? Lets say it was her son scalped by a member of a combative tribe? A person like that either has two choices?
1. Become the horror.
2. live a life in apathetic shock.
******'
Off topic.
When I read about descendants of slavery asking for compensation I think, what about Americans who lost family members in the Civil War on the Union side to end it? Do you hear Union family members who lost relatives long ago crying about it?
Americans also lost lives ending that savage Native American rule.
********'
Are there countries and Governments that exist today whereby the leadership traumatizes the people?
India Indians Magistrate gang raping young women.
And the list could go on and on.
But what happens when the justice system is lenient on drugs and a nonworking class emerges that likes to use them. They don't attain happiness from achievement but rather from drug use. Are a people like that likely to destroy the works of man and commit acts of violence and horror against them? I would say yes.
Do we have neighborhoods in the United States where that is rampant? In the inner city?
Shouldn't non inner city victims of inner city violence be compensated from it? But you can't take what someone else doesn't have and give it to someone else; because there is nothing to take! Remember? The person using drugs does not work to attain happiness.
Ever go into a workplace and see that what makes the employees most happy is what might be termed an apathetic or odd reaction to the customer? What fosters that? What group behavior is being promoted? Is it in the best interest of the American Public and our Constitution?
Justice needs to be to the point whereby a people are not living traumatized in perpetuity in their own communities.
© 2019 Thomas Murphy
Okay the next part was supposed to be a separate article but I am going to tack it on right here.
On Violence: Defending yourself against a known genetic freak.
I view violence as being started by the freaks amount us, they pushed someone too far.
It is not fair that the person that defends themselves, against what could be termed a known genetic freak, ever has to plead the insanity defense.
We would never have been the country the Founding Fathers founded if violent acts in self defense, even non immediate were not justified.
The legal precedent of today denies the fact that there exists horrible and creepy people in this world.
~ A man in Northern Wisconsin kidnaps a girl for 80 days. 1 week before that he was the same man as that right? What if he started a fight with someone 1 week before he was to kidnap that girl and that someone had killed him with his bare hands? Whatever the legal process is that person should not end up in jail or even be charged in my humble opinion.
Defending yourself against what could be termed a "Known genetic freak"...
So what type of plan could be legislated?
Phase 1: They are created by alcohol and drugs. Hence that needs to be abolished.
Phase 2: To be implemented over a period of 10 years. It is not fair for parole officers to be able to track them but general members of the public not being able to readily identify them. Identification and labeling. It would be the best way to decrease the negative influence television is having on the American Public. Only a mother of a beast would vehemently object. And specific identification criteria can not be allowed to be made by todays ruling class.
Why? It has to do with this profound assertion by me.
"Do you understand that if we did what we would have to do to please you that there would not be a single human being left on earth."
No comments:
Post a Comment