What does Independence Really Mean? 03 31 2019
In United States history it meant that someone (collectively known as the Monarchy) was being different and the issue could not be resolved.
In fact that monarchy was persecuting the Founding Fathers.
It means bein Independent from that which would persecute you.
That is what Independence really means.
So how did that ugly head appear in the United States again?
Through legalized alcohol and also the limited liability corporate structure.
Limited Liability is the template of persecution. It has no place in the United States. Do you know why it is here today? Because the upper class didn't want to define a person born mentally defective as being responsible for their own actions.
It is really simple to change. You, any U.S. Person should have limited liability with regard to the actions of a person born mentally defective. Prime example when using a product you created.
But what about a product created by management that can be deemed mentally defective? In that case they should have no defense against a normal person who uses the product and is injured because it too is defective.
And we should not be fostering management like that worldwide through what amounts to "buy in" immigration to the United States.
Do you see how the two sides of that scale of justice SHOULD BE DEFINED?
© 2019 Thomas Murphy
Ask yourself this? Could any of those motor mouths running for President of the United States think in terms even remotely close to this?
In United States history it meant that someone (collectively known as the Monarchy) was being different and the issue could not be resolved.
In fact that monarchy was persecuting the Founding Fathers.
It means bein Independent from that which would persecute you.
That is what Independence really means.
So how did that ugly head appear in the United States again?
Through legalized alcohol and also the limited liability corporate structure.
Limited Liability is the template of persecution. It has no place in the United States. Do you know why it is here today? Because the upper class didn't want to define a person born mentally defective as being responsible for their own actions.
It is really simple to change. You, any U.S. Person should have limited liability with regard to the actions of a person born mentally defective. Prime example when using a product you created.
But what about a product created by management that can be deemed mentally defective? In that case they should have no defense against a normal person who uses the product and is injured because it too is defective.
And we should not be fostering management like that worldwide through what amounts to "buy in" immigration to the United States.
Do you see how the two sides of that scale of justice SHOULD BE DEFINED?
© 2019 Thomas Murphy
Ask yourself this? Could any of those motor mouths running for President of the United States think in terms even remotely close to this?
No comments:
Post a Comment