Race Equates to Country? 03 19 2019
That is the particular genealogy of a country is usually most of the race there?
And I very well know that racism is pure stupidity, I understand that. I know the validity of that and what it means. I just want to make a point.
Are not Wars fought between Two Countries really Acts of Racism?
So one country/race goes to War with another country/race. One country is defending its race the other is aggressor. Could not the liberal argument be made by the weak minded in the same way it is made in other ways...that defending your own country/race/multi-race against another country/race/multi-race is really racism?
But what does it boil down to? What does the race belief? What does the race/multi-race of a country believe in?
Each country would argue that they are going to War for the benefit of their own people/race/multi race?
Can one Country in War always be stated to be the Racist?
Perhaps the concept of, "You become what you are willing to put up with," greatly applies in the issue and supersedes many of the other concepts involved in it?
Why do the people believe in their leader? Is it in and of their own volition? Have historians ever made a list of the people who supported their country going to war most unanimously? The people of this country went to war in and of their own volution? With percentage rankings?
In a Democracy should not the People of a Country be able to Vote whether they are going to agree to go to War or not? That would mean the War would be supported in and of their own volition?
Going to War not of your own Volition? Donald Trump and his foot problem? Oops he would say that is a low blow.
So what happens when you get a foreign Country that is just Gungho ready to destroy the United States? Putin once stated we would be drawed and quartered? But is that a Russian History term? When a foreign leader makes a statement like that I don't forget it. North Korea has said the same.
Look. I am not the type of guy...that when you make aggressive comments against me I come to some new age philosophy of understanding with regard to them, such as what is this person attempting to tell me. We just had a black leader of a Senate Hearing Panel tell us that is how we should view the crisis Cohen faces. And perhaps the older I get I do come to that new age mumbo jumbo. But not with Russia, etc. Not something like that.
Our Countries Constitution already boldly States that we are not to have an Army in times of peace. It is in BLACK AND WHITE INK! In fact it would be a valid grounds to impeach any US President since FDR! Or the Roosevelt's whose family money came from the Opiate Trade with China and shorting the U.S. Stock Market in order to cast us into financial collapse, end the ROARING TWENTIES and Defeat Prohibition all in one G@d D@maned coup!
© 2019 Thomas Paul Murphy
Some people like my diatribes!
And there might be Cognitive Elements with regard to racism that have remained Secret for far too long!
But what bothers me is when a Race attempts to change our Country to be less than the value of the United States Constitution. We did establish freedom here. And we shed a lot of blood to do it. Are we coming to an issue of responsibility of what it takes to maintain that standard?
Do we really want our Country to be lowered to the level of least common denominator with every other country there is? I don't believe in that. "It is this way in the country I came from I expect it to be this way in the United States too!" What is the right thing to tell someone like that? One word comes to mind. "Leave!"
*****;
Did the Colonists vote for the Revolutionary War? No. But in effect they did the same by saying, "Sign me up right away." Or "of course I will participate!" Their actions mean the same as if they voted. Same with the North in the Civil War.
But what since then? Murky. And the issue is transformed.
Look at where I am going with this and why? What would happen if we were allowed to vote to go to war today? The Pot Smoking Hippy low life's would vote no. So it isn't a good policy to consider.
Through all of our military actions...or better yet Trump touched on the issue. All the military support we give to foreign countries. Have those foreign countries stated, because we protected them they will increase their standards to that of our Constitution? No. That didn't happen! See where I am going with this? Save that country in a War and do they really respect you to the level that they should afterwards? Doubtful. By Empirical Evidence.
That is the particular genealogy of a country is usually most of the race there?
And I very well know that racism is pure stupidity, I understand that. I know the validity of that and what it means. I just want to make a point.
Are not Wars fought between Two Countries really Acts of Racism?
So one country/race goes to War with another country/race. One country is defending its race the other is aggressor. Could not the liberal argument be made by the weak minded in the same way it is made in other ways...that defending your own country/race/multi-race against another country/race/multi-race is really racism?
But what does it boil down to? What does the race belief? What does the race/multi-race of a country believe in?
Each country would argue that they are going to War for the benefit of their own people/race/multi race?
Can one Country in War always be stated to be the Racist?
Perhaps the concept of, "You become what you are willing to put up with," greatly applies in the issue and supersedes many of the other concepts involved in it?
Why do the people believe in their leader? Is it in and of their own volition? Have historians ever made a list of the people who supported their country going to war most unanimously? The people of this country went to war in and of their own volution? With percentage rankings?
In a Democracy should not the People of a Country be able to Vote whether they are going to agree to go to War or not? That would mean the War would be supported in and of their own volition?
Going to War not of your own Volition? Donald Trump and his foot problem? Oops he would say that is a low blow.
So what happens when you get a foreign Country that is just Gungho ready to destroy the United States? Putin once stated we would be drawed and quartered? But is that a Russian History term? When a foreign leader makes a statement like that I don't forget it. North Korea has said the same.
Look. I am not the type of guy...that when you make aggressive comments against me I come to some new age philosophy of understanding with regard to them, such as what is this person attempting to tell me. We just had a black leader of a Senate Hearing Panel tell us that is how we should view the crisis Cohen faces. And perhaps the older I get I do come to that new age mumbo jumbo. But not with Russia, etc. Not something like that.
Our Countries Constitution already boldly States that we are not to have an Army in times of peace. It is in BLACK AND WHITE INK! In fact it would be a valid grounds to impeach any US President since FDR! Or the Roosevelt's whose family money came from the Opiate Trade with China and shorting the U.S. Stock Market in order to cast us into financial collapse, end the ROARING TWENTIES and Defeat Prohibition all in one G@d D@maned coup!
© 2019 Thomas Paul Murphy
Some people like my diatribes!
And there might be Cognitive Elements with regard to racism that have remained Secret for far too long!
But what bothers me is when a Race attempts to change our Country to be less than the value of the United States Constitution. We did establish freedom here. And we shed a lot of blood to do it. Are we coming to an issue of responsibility of what it takes to maintain that standard?
Do we really want our Country to be lowered to the level of least common denominator with every other country there is? I don't believe in that. "It is this way in the country I came from I expect it to be this way in the United States too!" What is the right thing to tell someone like that? One word comes to mind. "Leave!"
*****;
Did the Colonists vote for the Revolutionary War? No. But in effect they did the same by saying, "Sign me up right away." Or "of course I will participate!" Their actions mean the same as if they voted. Same with the North in the Civil War.
But what since then? Murky. And the issue is transformed.
Look at where I am going with this and why? What would happen if we were allowed to vote to go to war today? The Pot Smoking Hippy low life's would vote no. So it isn't a good policy to consider.
Through all of our military actions...or better yet Trump touched on the issue. All the military support we give to foreign countries. Have those foreign countries stated, because we protected them they will increase their standards to that of our Constitution? No. That didn't happen! See where I am going with this? Save that country in a War and do they really respect you to the level that they should afterwards? Doubtful. By Empirical Evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment