Have a church leader fear of losing their job if they do not adopt the policies and ideas of the most wealthy donors to the Church?
That is anti religion isn't it? Because you have those who can't get into Heaven, per Jesus Christ, setting religious policy that then becomes law because it had religious leader backing.
And it is a clear violation of the Constitution. We don't need to cite this case or that when something is a clear violation of the Constitution. We don't need to reference anything else, other than stating it is a clear violation of the Constitution.
You know another way to describe this would be the term, "Money Pumping!"
You can't have good men as Priests; because money would pump them out of there.
There is God and there are those who falsely presume to know what God meant.
Dialog:
"The child I purchased is not going to be made to feel stigmatized in any way! Because my money is love!"
"But what about me? I can't afford to have one?"
"Well then, have one, and I'll buy it!"
"Since you have so much money that you are not getting into heaven; why don't you shut up."
And the wealthy are using what should have been the poor's money to buy the poor's children? I would assert that is true. Impoverish someone by stealing their soul? Conveniently offering a medical label for the action? Schizophrenic.
© 2023 Thomas Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment