When they use that term in print are they trying to get away from the idea that it was or could have been caused by alcohol usage during conception or pregnancy?
A subtlety?
As if this person is more unique than that? More special than someone who has a drug based genetic disorder?
Which brings up the next point. So it was an inherited rare genetic disorder? What are the odds it was first caused by alcohol usage during conception or pregnancy?
You get to be older and you see how genetic disorders from alcohol seem to pass down whereby it is like alphabet soup? Meaning the Grandmother had mental retardation but the Granddaughter has height issues consistent with Down's Syndrome?
What I mean is, you can see how the genetic lineage is tainted so that there is going to be a flaw, but it might not be the same flaw, but a flaw has to happen because of the first flaw? And perhaps I am suggesting something with regard to gene science and recombination that hasn't been studied or proven. But I would bet the statistics would prove it to be true.
© 2023 Thomas Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment