"Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
"
It means that Trump cannot serve. In order for Trump to serve Congress would need a vote of two thirds of each House.
If we had good lawyers in our Country Trump would never have been on the ballot in 2020. Why? Because per the above he can't!
So we needed perhaps a Speaker of the House to just read the law? Read the law to the people and tell them he cannot be on the ballot.
The Democrats are too full of Cotton Candy to be able to enforce the laws of the Democracy like how they should be enforced?
And perhaps a liberal attitude of who can be what? An attitude of nepotism? An attitude of all inclusion. Is why the Democratic Party is in the state of weakness it is in? They, just like the Republicans have become brainwashed by undo success granted?
And the way you should be thinking about it as an American is this way, if someone was granted undo success then who has been granted undo failure and why?
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
So if he can't be on the Ballot, do we as a Democracy have the legal power to arrest someone that puts him on the ballot?
Can you see the Keystones shaking their heads, dumbfounded and denying that doing so would be protecting and serving their country?
(A) Can you see the FBI saying that is not an element of their jurisdiction? That they are not really tasked with interpreting the Constitution.
Not only that I believe that we have the power to arrest anyone who puts certain issues on the ballot that are unconstitutional in an attempt to appeal to the Devils Advocate?
With regard to (A) above a lot of Judges want to make an exemption? They will deny that they have the authority to deem a law unconstitutional? And yet the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land which all other laws created must conform to. So you have a bit of a dislocation there. As if they don't want to read and assert the prime law. They would rather apply laws created by the States or local communities? So there is an element of treason in that?
You give a new janitor a mop and he tells you that he can only use a broom?
You see if you can't make...for the purpose of discussion...If you can't make a "judgement call" on that...if you can't figure out how the Constitution protects a citizens rights, if you stonewall and are dumbfounded as to the application of the Constitution, you should have never been a Judge!
*****'
What if there were salary caps on lawyers? I do think it would be part of a cleanup of our country.
No comments:
Post a Comment