Cocaine in his system 1 28 2023

 So yesterday on television I watched a motorcycle police officer stop to talk to a black man.

The situation escalated.

The black man ran.

And he wasn't really acting right.

He was tased.

Taken to the hospital and said to have died in the hospital.

It was found that he had Cocaine in his system and another drug.

So this time I might take the side of the Police Officer.

In a situation where a Police Officer shoots someone on drugs who is acting funny, should the Police Officer go to jail or I ask the question should the person who gave them the drugs that caused them to act funny go to jail?  I believe the Second there is more important.

*******'

What about a drunk driver?  What if the victims of a drunk driver had to be rewarded by the company that produced the alcohol?  Perhaps a mandatory $1 million for each member?   But under the stipulation that they themselves never drank?  So you would need an alcohol ID card for that.

I would also assert that anyone who has a family history of a certain type of mental illness should never be allowed to be sold alcohol.  Why?  Not because they can't handle the alcohol.  But because it makes them more susceptible to soul theft!

*******'

Now a flipside of the issue.

So I will attempt to make this next topic in generic terms.  Let's say that a son of a Judge gives someone a fentanyl pill that kills them.  Looks to me to be flat out murder.

But then you have to ask the question did that drug dealer son obtain that fentanyl from any connections that were made by the judge parent in any way?

And I could go on and on about career women and how the family suffers?  But I won't touch that here.

Perhaps I want to say something vitriolic, like if you can't even get your kids right what claim should you have to being a judge over the rest of us?

********'

A little bit off topic but it is drug related so I will bring it up here.

So you see on television lawsuit distributions whereby if someone had an autistic child while they took Tylenol they might be entitled to money? 

So I will just assume that where there is smoke there is fire on that issue?

With the point here being.  Two steps. (3)

One.  First in order for the drug to be approved it would have to have undergone testing both animal and people.

Two  In order for it to be available over the counter such tests would have to be thought to be more stringent?

Three.  The size scope and recommended use of the drug like it was akin to being as harmless as sugar cubes?

The point here is, how could they miss it?  You would have to have greedy eyes greener than a dinosaur to miss that it is linked to autism?

And with such a digression like that you have to put a bad check mark next to the organization responsible for approval of such things.

That's it.

******'

I could talk about what the Pope mentioned recently but if you ever heard the noise a screeching spoiled brat makes, that is what I experience in triplicate when I attempt to write about that topic.  Just like how Jesus tells us one defeated demon goes out and joins up with six others to come back at you??? Which tells you what about the perceived normality of it?

© 2023 Thomas Paul Murphy

Ps. And sure some of these articles are sketchy.  But I think a reasonable person knows what I mean when they read this.  That dyslexic adult who puts his hands over his ears and says dough dough dough when they don't like something you said to them, they are never going to understand anything anyway no matter how much they attempt to convince you they are an expert on everything.

Which brings up the question, do we have any known dyslexics in Congress?  Wait a minute we had one as President didn't we?  George Bush?  Somehow can you see an extension of that dark interpretation of things and people in his paintings?  It was like looking at a wax museum of horrors?