So we got into WW2 because Japan wanted to be viewed as equal or perhaps better than the norm countries? There was some group we didn't want them in? And they joined the Axis and bombed Hawaii.
So to keep us out of a World War again we attempted to view all nations as equals.
And we even viewed Russia as equals. And isn't it like Putin could only play that game for so long? And in the end it wasn't real to him?
So if the strategy of viewing all countries as equals fails us does that mean we should think of what the opposite of that means?
The opposite of that means that if they don't have the courage to match our Constitution, perhaps close to verbatim, we shouldn't view them as equals.
Some people have no idea when they have done something wrong in the eyes of people who have higher standards than them. Whoopbang! Prophetic isn't it?
And so Donald put in trade tariffs with foreign nations or at least one.
Why call it that?
Why not rephrase it.
Noncompliance with the Constitution Differential? NCD's
So indeed that gets their offense thinking differently?
Now as I typed that I sensed some sort of fear with regard to it. Not my own fear. But what would it mean? That universal world freedom. Who among us would that bother?
If you don't understand any of what I write ask me to clarify in the comments section. Serious inquiries responded to.
© 2023 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment