The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News

Sunday, January 4, 2026

Football Coach Talk 01 04 2026

"Throw into the receiving edge of single coverage before getting cross tackled by double coverage."

Did I just coin a term related to injury?

"Cross tackled."

There would also be, tackling into castled tackler?

Idk, something like that.

Facebook Humor 01 04 2026

"I went to a rummage sale and I got myself the best American made anvil from the 1930's and I only paid five dollars for it."

Now We Are Sure 01 04 2025

Now we are sure he doesn't want to rename that country? Idk..to something like "Trump?". Are we sure he doesn't want to make a resort out of that country? Are we quite sure of that?

*****'

It was named after the planet "Venus"???

And now that Epstein Island I'd defunct what a must have a tropical place called Venus is?

"Trump Venus" would be the new name of that place.

Right out of a futuristic sci fi novel?

If I am Trump I gotta do that! There is no way that if I am Trump that I am going to let that opportunity slip through my hands than to name the new country "Trump Venus!"

If I am Trump I have to do that! I have to do that!

Error checking? But indeed the planet Venus was named after a Roman Goddess of love and beauty. More so! If I am Trump I got to have that!

Saturday, January 3, 2026

What happens when the Revenue from Alcohol Dries Up 01 04 2026

There is a current trend to less alcohol consumption. (If you ever wanted to have faith in the younger generations that would be it! Wow! They are coming through!)

Will criminals resort to some desperate measures to stay ahead of the rest of us?

You often hear politicians say we need that alcohol revenue?

I don't need alcohol revenue like I don't need a bad friend.

So the implication is indeed it is quite substantial.

What happens when it starts to dry up in terms of what it is to be replaced with?

Not that I care that it dries up, quite to the contrary I hope it dries up forever!

Oh Jesus Christ, here is a good one!

So the roaring 20's the 1920s Prohibition was in effect. And the economy was booming, right? I will have to recheck that.

But what is that thought blocking crud? It is that the 20's were roaring because the gangsters were bootlegging alcohol? All the happiness was from all the drunks at the speakeasys? Not the good people! Do you get it? There is an implication or inference to that negative concept in the way crooked history teachers teach it? Perhaps the word or phrase best applicable is a false connotation? For lack of a better vocabulary than a vapid made wind tunnel vocabulary.

"Tom it was really all the chutzpah of those Prohibition bootlegging horrific murdering gangsters that caused the roaring twenties. Not any implication of a semblance of good non drinking people as you suggest."

Sometimes you have just heard enough!

Part II and III of God Created Man in the Image of God 01 04 2026

Part II. Can God Sin?

Can God sin?

Our current court system convicts God!

Are our sins Gods fault? If he sent us his only son the implication for doing so is guilt on his part?

We are told that man is flawed with sin.

And there is an issue of the father in this. It really depends on whether you had a good father or a bad father whether you sin?

So if I had a son and I did absolutely nothing to correct any bad behavior that son had have I indeed sinned? I would consider it a personal failure to be unable to instill good in him. But what does the court system say today? It say's that the parent is guilty if that son or daughter goes on mass shooting. And I think we can agree that a mass shooting is a sin.

God creates man, and man sins, God is guilty as a father who neglects a son per the above is?

If I am a father and my son sins just a little bit do I take that son to the people and say you are to give him all of your pain and suffering? If the people take me up on that are they not sinning? For the people to act that out are they acting in the image or edict of God? And a son could indeed commit a crime and be executed. But that isn't the exact issue religion is espousing. They are saying it more in a generality.

If I neglected a son per the above I have sinned. I have been a bad father. If God created man and man sins should man be absolved of his sins? If God created man and man commits a horrific crime has not God sinned? The current court system convicts God?

If God were perfect and God created man, hence why isn't man perfect? God didn't create man to be perfect because man would be like God if man was perfect? Hence God doesn't want man to be like him? Why doesn't God want man to be like him? A good father wants his son to be good too? A bad father doesn't know to care!

You and I both know that if your son commits a horrific crime it isn't Gods fault! You would have to know that. But yet you and I also know that a father is responsible for his son. You don't know that? A lot of people don't know that. Hence indeed the market for religion? And don't the nuns say prayer doesn't put the food on the table or something to that effect?

When God created man did he say, you need no other father than me? Don't consider your current father a father for I am your father? In the words of Jesus, God and the Father were one.

Can your father absolve you of sins? Not likely, unless he has so much money that he controls everything? So a question is, how can God absolve the sins of man?

Perhaps he forgives us because he created us and knows that we are faulted?

But should that be a selling point of religion? It goes against the idea of a valid and responsible father doesn't it! It diminishes the responsibility of being a good father!

Part III.

So if Adam and Eve were the first humans and they were kicked out of the Garden of Eden for eating the forbidden fruit; why was the fruit forbidden?

Because it was personal property and the owner of it would not share it? Hence they stole it?
Or this is what I always naturally believed from it, it was a poisonous fruit and they were not supposed to eat it.

So let's say that you believe that 2 is the reason. Adam and Eve apparently had all the skills and skillsets that they needed to survive. Seeing as the human race that descended from them numbers 8.3 billion people. So could they really have been that negligent as is implied in number 2 for the reason that they were kicked out?

And wait a minute, what happened to the people of the Garden of Eden? Where did they go? The population statistics don't say that there are 8.3 billion people and the people from the Garden of Eden are included in that. It doesn't say that there are 8.3 billion people exclusive of the people from the Garden of Eden.

*****'

And hence you find deep thought disturbing? And perhaps you would like to say it isn't representative of what a person should be? You need to read more and think about what you are reading. And think about what you are thinking. And be able to trace every thought in your mind and any origin of emotion that is attached to it.

Man created in the image of God 01 03 2026

So right off the bat man was created in God's image.

Presumably that means that man was created by God.

Then in some time in man's history on earth, God created Jesus Christ also in Gods image.

In order to absolve the sins of the original man created in Gods image?

So why didn't God create a version of himself in his image to guide us at the exact same time he originally created man in his image?

But if originally, we were created by God and in his image, then we too are sons of God? Hence God did not have only one son?

So we are to believe that God created us originally in his image but at that time we were originally created by him he denied that we were his sons?

There is a bit of a logic flaw in it, to lack a better at the moment vocabulary than that?

So he created man in his image but would have had to deny that original man was his son?

This writing is applied human reason and will of a human soul.

The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player