There is a current trend to less alcohol consumption. (If you ever wanted to have faith in the younger generations that would be it! Wow! They are coming through!)
Will criminals resort to some desperate measures to stay ahead of the rest of us?
You often hear politicians say we need that alcohol revenue?
I don't need alcohol revenue like I don't need a bad friend.
So the implication is indeed it is quite substantial.
What happens when it starts to dry up in terms of what it is to be replaced with?
Not that I care that it dries up, quite to the contrary I hope it dries up forever!
Oh Jesus Christ, here is a good one!
So the roaring 20's the 1920s Prohibition was in effect. And the economy was booming, right? I will have to recheck that.
But what is that thought blocking crud? It is that the 20's were roaring because the gangsters were bootlegging alcohol? All the happiness was from all the drunks at the speakeasys? Not the good people! Do you get it? There is an implication or inference to that negative concept in the way crooked history teachers teach it? Perhaps the word or phrase best applicable is a false connotation? For lack of a better vocabulary than a vapid made wind tunnel vocabulary.
© 2026 Thomas Paul Murphy
"Tom it was really all the chutzpah of those Prohibition bootlegging horrific murdering gangsters that caused the roaring twenties. Not any implication of a semblance of good non drinking people as you suggest."
Sometimes you have just heard enough!
No comments:
Post a Comment