So the presumption is that we need Greenland if we are attacked by Russia or China?
Which presumes that we would not surface a nuclear sub and launch a nuclear attack if that happened?
It presumes that we would not use any nuclear weapons we have based in Eurasia?
I think of those two countries as communist based. If they are not that then they are dictatorship based whereby elections are meaningless. Did the United States really want the Berlin Wall to fall so that Putin could threaten the world? And be the ongoing President of that country.
And good God what is an ongoing President if not a King!
So is Russia or China really the threat?
Or is it a Europe that is completely overrun and controlled by Russia and China?
Something people don't know about history. Once a country is taken over their people are conscripted in the army of the country that takes them over? Or killed? With rulers like that in power.
You saw the Hessen area of Germany conscript their citizens and sell their services to Great Britain against the United States in the United States Revolutionary War.
So you know what it is? It is fighting against someone else that isn't going to obey any known rules or pieces on a war zone puzzle like map? Things you didn't expect to happen because you are not 1 tenth as evil as the people you are fighting!
So perhaps what we are finding out with all the electronic gizmatics being launched at Russia...
There is an internet video that shows how some perhaps 19 drones were flying to destroy a cryogenic facility in Russia. And through perhaps 6 different waves of countermeasures 18 of those drones were destroyed and only one got through.
Do they have defenses against our missile guidance systems that could render them useless?
If you had the electronic counter systems of Russia and China arrayed against the United Stats along with their satellite systems used in the process...can we rely on our Nuclear defense as much as we thought we could?
And some would say that the long term effects of any nuclear war would destroy us all. But I would argue that living not in freedom is worse than that. That God wants us to live in freedom. No matter what who wrote the Bible states about who can have slaves... I mean right there! No! We are better than that. The human race is better than that! We are better than any politically concocted religion.
So perhaps the point of this is that you shouldn't look at the idea of Greenland coming from the mouth of one buffoon? There are advisors who have studied many circumstances and trends relating to this? Despite if you believe that the Republicans fired all the good people as the Republicans would have you believe...there has to be some accurate defensive thinking involved with regard to our protection.
And perhaps there is an element of knowing what those who do not live in freedom hate about those who do live in freedom!
*****'
What about imperialist like expansion? Is that how we view Venezuela? Well our leadership is making the commitment we won't lead it after awhile.
But the necessity for Greenland? Is it like a game of monopoly? Whereby once someone gets a lot of strategic land points they are very hard to beat?
I don't know. I try and see if from the other side and I revert back to the point we shouldn't even have a military in times of peace per our Constitution.
Flipsiding again. Our Founding Fathers didn't want us to have too much to do with foreign countries. Do we have so many foreigners here in the United States today that whatever the perceived threat of foreign countries was back then it is lessening us right now because of that composition? Lessening our freedom.
I would argue, yeah that is true.
Some people here likely wouldn't want to fight for our freedom. They want a gov form of wink wink nod nod they don't have to worry about anything because they know the wink wink nod nods will take care of them? They don't like our form of government because they look around at other people in this country, compare themselves unfavorably as being soulless dolts, and hence they want that favoritism form of gov?
I could go on and on about the lesser among us believing more in terms of territories and domains in terms of what they mean by the word community? Places you can't really go because one or another subgroup here really can't stand you per the above soulless dolts argument? Might even be entire financial industries whereby that racism and money recycling is in play? If you were tormented by voices you would know who doesn't believe in the rest of us. Or perhaps more accurately stated, who has no self to believe in. I didn't make that last sentence up, one of those persons in question told me of that a very long time ago.
© 2026 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment