http://www.brainjet.com/random/13097/15-things-you-were-taught-in-school-that-are-total-lies#slide/15/0
The fact that Van Gogh did not cut off
his own ear is very telling isn't it! Do you remember your Italian
High School history teacher relishing when he told you that Van Gogh
cut off his own ear? Why would they say that he cut off his own ear?
It really raises a lot of fear about people who hear voices doesn't
it! Did Van Gogh accuse Gauguin of causing him to hear voices? Did
Gauguin steal his skill set from Van Gogh? And when Van Gogh
confronted him about it Gauguin cut off his ear? Van Gogh might have
had a problem with Jews; from my reading and understating of him. So
say Van Gogh hears voices as is what is indeed depicted in his
painting “The Scream” Why discredit him by saying he cut off his
own ear when he didn't? Van Gogh would have had a lot of clout when
his paintings were becoming famous. Were they afraid of what he knew
and what he represented? What we see here is a historical trend to
stigmatize those who hear voices as also being something odd that
everyone should fear because of that? So why do that to someone?
History was falsely written concerning him! Weren't you like me in
that you thought this man had a fixation on a woman and the poor guy
tried to prove how much he loved her by cutting off his own ear? How
is history controlled to get that so horribly wrong? It is a great
historical shame that goes on every day in the United States! It
follows the same trend of stigmatizing the mentally ill as more
dangerous than the rest of the population when the truth is indeed
that those who hear voices are 13 times more likely to be a victim of
violence than a perpetrator of it. So really you have someone that
is 13 times more likely to be a victim of violence than a perpetrator
of it, isn't that the exact type of citizen the 2nd
amendment was written for? 13X more times; those are the exact
types of people who are a lot more safe to have guns by definition! What religions were both Van Gogh and Gauguin of?
I can even remember a kid in high
school doing a biographical report on Van Gogh and seemingly
relishing in the fact that he cut off his own ear. Somehow I knew it
wasn't true back then! I could read that kid lying; his father
happened to be a psychologist!!!!!!!!
What about Viking Lief Erickson really
discovering America in 1000AD. Why would they say Christopher
Columbus did? Because they had intended on enslaving the native
American population and it created many more false reasons to do so
when all you hear is Christopher Columbus's opinion and saying he
discovered it? The native Americans were so nice that he said they
would be easy to enslave!!! But would that be the story he
propagandized back in England or Spain or wherever he came from?
What is the key fact about it being 1000ad? What else was going on
in history about 1000ad that they never wanted to have linked to
Lief Erickson discovering the U.S.? Celtic =Vikings?? ? They are
discrediting the Irish. And some of the Irish brought to the U.S.
Had been enslaved by the British. We know this because some sided
with the British in the Revolutionary War because the British were
said to have promised them freedom from enslavement!
Thomas Edison really didn't discover
the light bulb but bought the patent from Heinrich Goebels!!! So who
was Heinrich Goebels? Why make it seem like it was discovered by
Edison? Was Heinrich Goebels in the United States or Germany?
Heinricht Goebels??? They often say that two people working
separately discover the same thing, and recently some people seem to
believe the one given credit for it wasn't the one who should have
been. It hints at dependent mindedeness does'nt it!
And what about Ben Franklin not flying a
kite with a key attached to it to discover electricity? Do you
remember your chain smoking eighth grade school teacher tempting you
to do that yourself! Tempting you to be electrocuted?
Why did they say witches were burnt at
the stake when they weren't? Because it makes it seem like those
punishing them were a lot worse than them!!! What are they trying to
get at? The history writers were trying to hide the fact that a
witch is a vey bad person! If you say those who punish are worse
than the criminal then you lessen the chance that someone will ever
be punished for that same thing in the future!!! This reminds me a
lot of the fraudulent case concerning a black man that was used to do
away with the death penalty in Chicago!
I can tell you without a doubt that
your history professor is a completely different breed! Somehow they knew exactly what was false history when they were teaching it!!!
What about the moon being held in place by gravity? NASA scientist knew that!
http://www.brainjet.com/random/13097/15-things-you-were-taught-in-school-that-are-total-lies#slide/15/0
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 05 22 2015 at:
www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
The fact that Van Gogh did not cut off
his own ear is very telling isn't it! Do you remember your Italian
High School history teacher relishing when he told you that Van Gogh
cut off his own ear? Why would they say that he cut off his own ear?
It really raises a lot of fear about people who hear voices doesn't
it! Did Van Gogh accuse Gauguin of causing him to hear voices? Did
Gauguin steal his skill set from Van Gogh? And when Van Gogh
confronted him about it Gauguin cut off his ear? Van Gogh might have
had a problem with Jews; from my reading and understating of him. So
say Van Gogh hears voices as is what is indeed depicted in his
painting “The Scream” Why discredit him by saying he cut off his
own ear when he didn't? Van Gogh would have had a lot of clout when
his paintings were becoming famous. Were they afraid of what he knew
and what he represented? What we see here is a historical trend to
stigmatize those who hear voices as also being something odd that
everyone should fear because of that? So why do that to someone?
History was falsely written concerning him! Weren't you like me in
that you thought this man had a fixation on a woman and the poor guy
tried to prove how much he loved her by cutting off his own ear? How
is history controlled to get that so horribly wrong? It is a great
historical shame that goes on every day in the United States! It
follows the same trend of stigmatizing the mentally ill as more
dangerous than the rest of the population when the truth is indeed
that those who hear voices are 13 times more likely to be a victim of
violence than a perpetrator of it. So really you have someone that
is 13 times more likely to be a victim of violence than a perpetrator
of it, isn't that the exact type of citizen the 2nd
amendment was written for? 13X more times; those are the exact
types of people who are a lot more safe to have guns by definition! What religions were both Van Gogh and Gauguin of?
I can even remember a kid in high
school doing a biographical report on Van Gogh and seemingly
relishing in the fact that he cut off his own ear. Somehow I knew it
wasn't true back then! I could read that kid lying; his father
happened to be a psychologist!!!!!!!!
What about Viking Lief Erickson really
discovering America in 1000AD. Why would they say Christopher
Columbus did? Because they had intended on enslaving the native
American population and it created many more false reasons to do so
when all you hear is Christopher Columbus's opinion and saying he
discovered it? The native Americans were so nice that he said they
would be easy to enslave!!! But would that be the story he
propagandized back in England or Spain or wherever he came from?
What is the key fact about it being 1000ad? What else was going on
in history about 1000ad that they never wanted to have linked to
Lief Erickson discovering the U.S.? Celtic =Vikings?? ? They are
discrediting the Irish. And some of the Irish brought to the U.S.
Had been enslaved by the British. We know this because some sided
with the British in the Revolutionary War because the British were
said to have promised them freedom from enslavement!
Thomas Edison really didn't discover
the light bulb but bought the patent from Heinrich Goebels!!! So who
was Heinrich Goebels? Why make it seem like it was discovered by
Edison? Was Heinrich Goebels in the United States or Germany?
Heinricht Goebels??? They often say that two people working
separately discover the same thing, and recently some people seem to
believe the one given credit for it wasn't the one who should have
been. It hints at dependent mindedeness does'nt it!
And what about Ben Franklin not flying a
kite with a key attached to it to discover electricity? Do you
remember your chain smoking eighth grade school teacher tempting you
to do that yourself! Tempting you to be electrocuted?
Why did they say witches were burnt at
the stake when they weren't? Because it makes it seem like those
punishing them were a lot worse than them!!! What are they trying to
get at? The history writers were trying to hide the fact that a
witch is a vey bad person! If you say those who punish are worse
than the criminal then you lessen the chance that someone will ever
be punished for that same thing in the future!!! This reminds me a
lot of the fraudulent case concerning a black man that was used to do
away with the death penalty in Chicago!
I can tell you without a doubt that
your history professor is a completely different breed! Somehow they knew exactly what was false history when they were teaching it!!!
What about the moon being held in place by gravity? NASA scientist knew that!
http://www.brainjet.com/random/13097/15-things-you-were-taught-in-school-that-are-total-lies#slide/15/0
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 05 22 2015 at:
www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment