Biden on Marijuana 10 07 2022

So Biden is making an effort to pardon those convicted on Federal Marijuana Charges.

What do I have to say about it?

1. I think the drug is bad. And it causes both mental retardation and also, I will assert it whacks people out to the point it causes suicide. As bad as that is I don't think it is as bad as opiates that kill you quicker than that.

2. So someone is in possession of marijuana? What is the typical marijuana user? Are they mentally retarded or come from a non-nuclear family (like the Republicans advocate through prolife?) We don't really know. Or is it more just the opposite of that? Are these straight-laced people born without genetic disorders that are being targeted by drug dealers and the dark side of humanity? So they are both given and pressured to take the drug because it ruins their lives. And satan among is jealous of that human protentional! Human penitential emotionally disturbs satan in every way. I will assert that is true!

3. So are these people who went to jail people who were given the drug or had the drug pushed on them? Are these poor white people? Did the drug also change their sexual genetics? But the point here, is if someone lays a bag of flaming something on your front door step you are not the guilty person in the matter! So there is a hiding of the real criminals here! And that is what bothers me about this. Never able to get to those millionaires in the scheme! Perhaps even billionaires.

So lets take a few steps backward and look at the nature of the problem.

American citizens are having their lives ruined by this and other drugs. I believe it is no different than if someone were to intentionally figure out a way to sum certain infect you with covid-19 and you died from it. So to me it isn't a drug war. It is a War on America.

But how and where and why should the line be drawn? How do you draw that line. This person was targeted and addicted and had their life ruined and went to prison versus the other extreme, this person made 250 million dollars selling the drug.

And it is indeed legal in many states.

So the problem with decriminalization is that you are going to have a lot of innocent young people being made retards from this drug. I hate that idea! They aren't going to work. They are going to resent the educated. They are going to resent the natural human mind. They are going to resent people who can think for themselves. They are going to resent people with moral resolve and personal initiative.

All of those micro arrests hide the king pin suppliers in the crime!

And so lets compare it to another historical drug problem our nation faced. Alcohol and Prohibition. So the court system is said to not want to prosecute the bootleggers. The bootleggers labeled untouchable. Which tells you that socioeconomic status of lawyers., first one becomes a lawyer befoe a a judge, were all alcoholics! Fond of the drug. (Shame I have to spell out these connections for you because you can't rise to the same wavelength of understanding? What is plain as daylight to me is a foggy notion to someone else?) And Prohibition failed. Okay but we did catch some of them through the use of the IRS! Then we got drawn into WW2 by FDR giving supplies to a foreign government that was historically our greatest enemy up to that point in United States history. But the main point of this large paragraph is, a lot of money is being made on marijuana and the drug trade. And we even had the Patriot Act put forth measures to track money flow. So we should have been able to use that collection function of the U.S. Gov to home in on the drug profiteers and put them out of business. But it didn't happen. And we should have strong armed foreign trade with any country that they were known to reside in. It is like how someone gets a ransomware attack and no one claims to be able to know where it came from? Bouncing off satellites they tell us? I have a lot of trouble believing that. At least you could narrow it down to the country it originates from and modern “blockade” them. In other words no U.S. Are allowed to be held by their banks. No United States banks are allowed to have branches in those countries. No step back and look at the gestalt of the meaning of that in terms of global banking. It really means global banking has been a misnomer from day one! Global banking more equivalent to networked criminality? And our founding fathers did indeed want us to be independent of those nations that didn't believe in freedom. And sure when we are all young we believe “Why can't we have United States freedom everywhere throughout the entire world???) And the best answer is the one that chain smoking Catholic Grade School teacher told us, ~~~“Because those types of governments are best at managing those types of people.” And when you are young you think, no that can't be true. That hints at some form of racism. But when you are older it is hard to believe that it isn't true.

And when we have politicians making bad decisions for the rest of us, I mean can they prove that they are not in allegiance to a foreign form of Government?

So lets say that what our Gov sees. These drugs are really being used to target Americans and ruin their lives. Then yes you should free the targeted individuals as Biden is. Why? Because it is a War on America. A criminal so devious they figured out a way to make a country imprison their own best citizens with great human potential. I will assert that is how a drug dealer king pin top of the dung heap thinks.

And don't get me wrong. I hate the drug. I hate its effect on people. I hate the oddness and freakishness it causes. I hate the effeminateness in both orientation and thinking that it causes. I hate its weakness.

So a line should be drawn. I also believe in Prohibition! (Oh and I wanted to do a little research and write an article about the quality of life for black people during Prohibition. I bet it was better. Is Prohibition sometimes wrongly equated with Nazism? You know, forgive me if I believe it is a question worth asking.)

And indeed perhaps a Federal Charge for Marijuana has to be a very serious one in the first place? I don't know. I don't have the wherewithal to do that research and look at those statistics. Which always prove to be misleading?

Ever in your life seen someone charged with creating statistics that were criminally negligent and misleading? I doubt it. Why doesn't it happen? Because that is a different tier of money that buys those statistics to be created that way in the first place.

Okay, that's enough.

© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy

Ps. But what if we have a changing demographic in this country that uses it daily? Does that mean we bow to that weak link? The other end of that extreme would be to prevent that changing demographic.