So if they won't tell us the names because it is a matter of national security, what does that mean?
Does it mean that so many prominent people in our United States Government used their underage prostitutes for sex that if they were all prosecuted there would be no one crooked left in Government; and somehow that is a matter of national security?
Again, if it is sure to convict a prominent member of United States Government then it is precluded from prosecution because it is a matter of national security?
If they are elected...the above really implies that they aren't elected? Because that is a state of unfairness that they are allowed to participate in? Or perhaps one asks the question, what are they elected to; if it is a matter of national security that their crimes are forbidden from being known by the public?
Let me try and flush this out some more.
If they were ostensibly elected in fairness then their criminal or even questionable actions would not be shielded from the public and prosecution as a matter of national security.
And this is all hypothetical. But when you see all the people E was buddy buddy with, how can you not come to the above conclusion? You would have to be farm field haystack naïve not too?
© 2023 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment