Isn't that really like he created his own trickle down kingdom within a Democracy of the Free?
I believe it should be disallowed.
So the good of the people argument for it being allowed in current form is that these people help to address needs our Government doesn't?
I think instead, it serves as an obstruction to or antithesis of a Constitutional Democracy of the Free.
So does it really mean that a billionaire doesn't believe that they can use their money to lobby for what our Country needs?
Or does it really mean that a billionaire is funding things that our Gov wouldn't fund for a valid reason?
Or does it really mean a billionaire was allowed to have too much money? So much so that he was allowed to create a Trickle Down Economic Kingdom?
I believe in pulling the lynch pin out of all forms of Trickle Down Economic Kingdoms. (TDEK)
The TDEK is synonymous with the Sycophant?
In favor of what?
A working man who doesn't drink or use drugs being able to afford a home and raise a family in peace?
© 2023 Thomas Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment