I can't really say the particulars of this one. And I am not really prepared to articulate it in a vague manner.
But this one deals with the character of someone who willfully chose the life of being a sex worker.
They were not from this country.
I want to say something about character.
*****'
I want to ask a question. If a high ranking person knew a pimp. The pimp said they they were his best friend for years on end...
"High ranking official do you also know drug dealers?"
When organized crime was established in the U.S. it was initially drugs and prostitution?
*****'
When the character of a witness implies a prior belief system and method of behavior? That would preclude them from suing they way up in class? Do you see where I am going with this?
Evidence such as, "How dare you....when you did this, this and this." Can't be submitted in court. Even though this, this and this is highly relevant.
And perhaps I should review the current legal codes on this. Because this is just conjecture.
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
A reasonable person read that you did this this and this. And that your husband was undeniable friends with someone who did this this and this.
So look who gets attacked in this? Look who has to face justice for what amounts to a whole lot of other peoples wrongs that were never accounted for or realized by a sense of "public morality?"
When the person who is falling under scrutiny reaches out against the people not responsible for that?
No comments:
Post a Comment