Is there an element or sense of "Wealth genetics" being better genetics?
Does a person who claws their way to the top, who thinks like the blood thirsty fox, once they get successful do they do so or do they then feel it is because of better genetics?
And hence that is who should determine who is paid what in trickle down economics?
It needs to be reconfigured.
*****'
You see our country was founded in opposition to Royalty and Royal Blood lines ruling. If you can't make the equivocation between Royalty believing themselves to be genetically superior and hence calling themselves royalty because of that, then what can you do?
So indeed their is a sense of Royalty in trickle down economics isn't there. The hand that feeds is the royal hand. And it doesn't really matter if that is the dirty hand of an ignoramus from organized crime does it, it still has a sense of royalty to it.
I mean good God you want to talk about entitlements in this country? The entitlement of giving yourself royal class by being the top of trickle down economics?
******'
Okay now a note to the flipside! The other side of the issue. The idea that wealthy people have gotten wealthy by creating employment. Creating employment, it is really a beautiful thing isn't it! And to deal with all those new employees bad attitudes and ignorance and rudeness... Creating employment, do you remember how proud you were when you worked hard, you listened, you respected the employer, and you got that first paycheck! Beautiful thing isn't it.
And hence is that why Republicans give tax cuts to the wealthy? Well from that perspective it makes sense doesn't it?
I wish that I had the patience to be such an employer that creates employment and hence wealth for themselves. I wish I had the patience to be a teacher. etc, etc etc.
*****'
And did you ever wonder how an awful employer raises their own children? Just read the news, it doesn't go to well does it.
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment