Gun Violence and Death by Cop or Man? 05 05 2021
So someone with a weapon or perhaps not a weapon charges a Police Officer. The Police Officer kills the person with a gunshot.
My basic point here is. Someone charges a United States Citizen with a weapon or perhaps not; that person shoots them in their defense and kills them. Why shouldn't that citizen have the exact same rights as the Police Officer in that matter? Instead of Death by Cop it should be ruled Death by Man?
Someone could kick your legs out from under you and after that you would be done!
So you are the man in the above example and a Police Officer arrives at the scene. You are scared and in shock and holding the weapon that killed the attacker. You also have reason to believe there are other assailants, perhaps gang members of the person in the area. And indeed they too may be hiding and a danger to the Police Officer as well as you. And you don't drop the gun because your hands are froze to it. And you are shot dead.
So this too is a murky area. Lets say that you have the same rights as the Police Officer as I outlined. What protocol should a Police Officer take in the issue? He is there to protect the public. And you are that Public that needs the protecting and did it already. Now I don't know the exact rules they follow. Obviously if they believe someone is going to shoot them they should be able to shoot. But shouldn't you be able to to? Without any worry about being charged? Because you should have that right? I think the courts weight it down on you though.
Do I guess what makes this murky in my mind is that years ago there was a Police Officer in Milwaukee whose brother was a drug lord or pimp or something like that. Okay look at the chess pieces on the board in the above? No matter what it is like a no win for the citizen?
Is Gun Violence really the right term to use or is it misleading? So can we presume that someone decided to take their own life by challenging someone else with a weapon who isn't a Police Officer? I mean how many deaths like that are really completely justified self defense. So why call it Gun Violence? Why label the person going on their merry way in life who protects themselves like that as a violent person? I think it is really a wrong term to use. The media has locked onto it though.
As if you don't have that right! What right do you have to become violent and defend yourself against an attacker? You were not violent at all were you? You were going on your merry way. You were confronted with some drug wired freak with the circular mind of a dog that chases its tail. And I will indeed that is what alcohol does to people. It creates that circular mind. The one that likes to quote every odd cliché that they ever have seen in any movie. As it is their memorized nuevo modern Bible?
Why call it gun violence? If we don't have the people in power with the authority and ability to break out the statistics so that they are not lumped into one misleading category then I believe our colleges are not producing a product that benefits our nation.
So here is a new legal standard that I believe in. The person with the drugs in their system is always guilty in this matter? The person with the pot in their system is always the guilty one. The person with the alcohol in their blood is always the guilty one? You likely won't be able to come to that point of view if you do not drink. Yeah and I was young and drank. And it was fun. But I don't a friend from that time in my life, I don't like any of those memories of drinking. And you know what? It is true. I absolutely never think of the times I drank. Why not? The better question is, why would I? Perhaps the experience of life when your brain is being deprived of oxygen from alcohol isn't valid, meaningful or worthwhile memories? And perhaps if you are a drinker and want to stop. You should think of it that way too. It is like the memories while drinking are experiences of you being cheated out of life?
Do you ever see people can't wait to grab for that smoke or whatever? I can't stand that! Why? Because they are being cheated out of life experience! Hard to explain, but the concept is real and true.
You see all the gun violence on the news. And it wants to tear at your heart strings doesn't it. I don't think that is fair in any way to the people involved in the violence.
Here is another one. A man beats his wife. A cop arrives on the scene and kills the beater. Seems like he did the right thing right? Who could say he should be charged with anything? Not me. Given that is all there is to the relationships of everyone involved. So again. Why doesn't the woman who is being beaten have the exact same right as the Police Officer standing in that situation? You say I sound like a kook? Don't you believe that principle would go a very long way in ending husbands beating their wives? I think it would. But you want to play the devils advocate on the issue don't you?
And sure perhaps you have stand your ground laws in your favor. But I believe that innocent until proven guilty isn't being applied when you are brought up on charges in a matter like that?
I do believe a lot of this serves to weaken our nation. And I will say it again. The Purple Gang were horrifically violent bootleggers and the court system wouldn't touch them; they were untouchable. I think we have some of that legacy in the system. I think a lot of these "liberal" policies serve to weaken our nation with the intent to destroy it. And it was found out that some court cases were rigged so that it would weaken the validity of calling for the death penalty sentence? Who does that serve? It serves a networked organized crime. What good is that for our nation? Less than zero.
"Gun violence." As if you have a gun to protect yourself it means you are a violent person with violent tendencies! Do you see? It is like one of those veiled queer psychiatric criteria being slobbered all over the American Red White and Blue.
So hearing that term is indeed another one of the reasons I can't stand to watch that boobed tube.
© 2021 Thomas Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment