A lot of people who don't like Social Security? 11 18 2021

 A lot of people who don't like Social Security? 11 18 2021

A lot of people who don't like Social Security, are wealthier, and what they don't realize is that they would not be here if it were not for Social Security..

And it makes for a split economy doesn't it?  On the one hand you have Capitalism and on the other you attempt to not let people go poor, hungry and homeless through Social Security.

What does Social Security accomplish for the wealthy?  It creates a source of money to which people have to spend which ends up back in their pockets.  Feeder money if you will.

And it was created by FDR, the same President who took us into WW2 and legalized alcohol and created gun control.

So where do I go with this article?  I don't know.  But I read of a wealthy person who bragged how he spent $40,000.00 on marijuana a month?

Is Social Security meant to support that?

Is Social Security meant to support alcoholism?

Is the only reason alcohol was legalized so that the wealthy could wipe their conscience clean of any social responsibility to communities and our country?

Now look at that?  How many wealthy would remain wealthy if Alcohol was not legal?  And what does the person that makes a lot of money do?  Immediately does he thank God?  Does he thank his customers?  No, he worships the spirit of alcohol.  The spirit of the devil if you will?  To celebrate by erasing your memory of how you attained it (money.)  Now analyze that.  Organized Crime could not exist without alcohol!  Because there would be no adjunct to wipe away that human conscience for the crimes you committed.

How many people were allowed to immigrate to this country as a matter of the same good nature as Social Security is?  And that is basically who I am mainly referring to?

Are there individual cultures here today that threaten our Constitutional rights because they don't live by that standard?

And why should their be a cap on it?  What justification is there?  Because someone became so extremely wealthy they are considered to not be responsible for the other people of our country?  I am so wealthy, like a celebrated king, that I no longer have to be responsible for the other people in our country?  Shouldn't the standard of man thinking dictate it should be just the opposite of that?  The Constitutional provisions and laws based on them created the avenues toward wealth for you?  And are there not some loopholes in that regard that need to be closed when they lead to the rise of wealthy dictator like personalities?  It is called empirical evidence, as in, you are so bad it is a crying shame that there was a way you became wealthy in our nation.

And we had a wealthy man in Finance who had his own island and was pimping young girls?  That person could never live up to the standards the rest of us would have to with regard integrity in that business?  But if you said a bad word about that there is something wrong with you; like a black sheep?  When indeed the opposite should be true.  So why and how did our right to free speech fail us on people and groups of people like that?

And sometimes you can tell when a person is a total fraud when they are like this, "As soon as I have a cigarette it will come to me?"  Come from where?  Some shaman tent somewhere?  Some voodoo ritual?  Some drug house séance?  Some vacant headed mother that stares out the window all day?  Some whorehouse bed?  A whorehouse bed at a wealthy country club?  Am I getting at the origins of illegitimacy?

Perhaps this country took you in when we should not have?  So how do we become who we are and who we are meant to be when you have a necessitated goal of defeating that?

© 2021 Thomas Murphy