Wiser in Health Habits from the Get Go 01 16 2022
So in terms of what the best vaccine is? Is there a Vaccine that isn't approved that would have a 5% greater efficacy rate and therefore could have saved 275,000 lives worldwide already?
And what is the jargon? The jargon is this. People who get the current vaccines are still getting the virus but they are not dying from it as much?
So you know medicine and statistics? I would believe from all of the above the reason that those people are not dying from it is because they had better health habits from the get go as evidenced by them taking the personal initiative to get vaccinated? And those better health habits transcend into them not dying from it once they do get it?
What I am getting at here is what is the other argument? That for some reason the current vaccines have a dual layer of protection? One layer that prevents you from getting it. And another layer of immunity that prevents you from dying from it?
So perhaps the best take away from this article is developing a vaccine whereby the first layer is strong enough so that the second layer of immunity is not triggered?
Do you follow what it means? And perhaps there is an issue in regard to proper labelling of vaccines?
I mean am I being vaccinated against getting the virus or vaccinate from dying from it?
Even though the vaccinated from dying from it what is important. There is a dichotomy there.
And what does that dichotomy suggest? That we should have vaccines that prevent us from getting the virus, forget about dying from it, prevent us from getting it?
And what does that mean? What does it mean to get it? It means that it already caused your human cells to replicate it.
So again that dual layer. What we are being told is that with the vaccines we have approved now the virus will not replicate to the point it can kill you? I don't know I want to draw a picture of a sea saw.
But I will make a new point on the opposite side. So if you get Covid 19 and your immunity wins over it whether you had the vaccine or not does that make you less likely to get it again? That is the idea of heard immunity? And that is more important with regard to that phase 2 immunity I described above? And I don't believe that they know the answer to the implied question there. Or perhaps it is the tough news. The virus mutates and you are back to square one with regard to it? I believe that the empirical evidence tends to lean that way?
But lets talk about phase 2 immunity above. So we believe that the current vaccines kick in and prevent it from killing you? But can the method of action be scientifically validated? For example it is these specific immune responses that are saving you? A. They are caused by the vaccine. B. They are full circle to the title of this article?
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
You know what it is like? You take your car to a mechanic and he fixes it. And he tells you it will be riding rough and it will be noisy, but it will get you where you are going? And you think? And that is what I am paying for? And then he tells you, "Otherwise you wouldn't have no car at all if I didn't fix it."
No comments:
Post a Comment