"A fellow real estate entrepreneur of mine..."
What am I talking about? Perhaps it is about creating and propagandizing deceptive legal terminology?
Should it be called Sex Trafficking? That has a very innocent tone to it doesn't it? Like a woman who couldn't find a better job is devoting her life to being a crossing guard at the school? (Oh my. She keeps track of who the pretty girls are and what families they come from?) No that isn't what I am talking about.
I am making a comment about highly regarded real estate entrepreneur and the circles they travel in or the flocks they attend? No.
I want to say this. That isn't sex trafficking that happened. (Epstein case.)
It is creating a business where criminals pay to rape minors on a secluded island.
Finance an island like that as part of an integrated real estate entrepreneur public profile?
You couldn't think very much of people if you called it sex trafficking instead of "Creating a business where criminals pay to rape minors on an island."
You really never read how sick it is. Because there has never been anyone else who can see it for what it is and have the wherewithal to say it.
How come the IRS didn't catch it like they did the bootlegger?
It has to do with generally either being on the good side or the bad side? You wouldn't have got that job if you generally were on the good side? You know, what a shame, I really see it that way.
Oh, and "His wife is a really nice woman."
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
And what law firm generally advised Ep during the time this criminal idea was being contemplated and implemented? Makes you wonder how many times a law firm has "pre meditated" advised a client on how to get away with murder?
And I am not meaning to imply it is I who is talking about a fellow real estate entrepreneur in this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment