A Range of Language 04 14 2022

 A Range of Language 04 14 2022

I am talking about freedom of speech.

Facebook flagged me for comparing someone to an animal.  My account still has a warning status because of that.

But lets take a look at Vladimir Putin.

If someone is committing War crimes are we in the United States going to restrict the range of freedom of speech with regard to what can be said about someone like that?

If you have a full range of freedom of speech then you have everyone saying what they believe to the best of their ability.  And isn't it therefore easier to find the truth, the mean or ...  By hearing the range of free speech with regard to an individual, perhaps some people who have a higher vocabulary or intellect take note of what is being said and investigate it?  And justice is therefore better served by never restricting free speech?

What good does it do the people of the Ukraine or for that matter the U.S. in their role as an ally to the Ukraine if restrictions created by media companies with regard to freedom of speech could have vetted out Putin sooner, and therefore prevented more deaths?

The home of the brave, the nation of the free.  What does it mean when you fear just the words someone said to you or about you?

One could argue that the people of Russia have a lot more in common with the people of the Ukraine than the people in the United States.  And if you see what Putin is doing to them to you ask yourself what would he do to United States Citizens which he finds less similar?

Could articulate this some more but that's all for now.

© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy

One more point.  Someone wants to sue the media companies because their son became a social media junky, got a negative self body image and committed suicide?  Actually it is the father of that person.

I would think you could have made that same assertion with regard to television if you wanted to?

Did not his son have the will not to partake in social media if he wanted to?  So what does it mean when we declare that certain individuals don't really have the free will to make decisions?

Now on the flipside.  What about algorithms that place smack dab center on whatever internet page you are reading advertising related to products.  Now what about those same algorithms related to self image?  I do believe that perhaps that is something adolescents might not be able to handle!  And what do they amount to?  There goes a human soul and the money from it does into a rich persons pocket.

So in that case it isn't a violation of freedom of speech is it!  In is a violation of his personal right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure!  Unreasonable to put an image in front of his face based on his media habits, which most likely are a desire for knowledge?  So you have a few feeding of the minds of those who desire knowledge?  Pretty sickening. 

© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy

And restricting your range of language is also a way of saying that your belief system is not an appropriate one?  And what is that?  That is a violation of your right of freedom of religion!  Your belief system being the equivalent of your religion.  And no that isn't a stretch of logic.

So restricting ones freedom of speech also restricts or violates their freedom of religion.  In a way it is like saying you are not to say that this person in question is not a God?  When you say that the range of what can be said about a person has to fall into the upper two thirds of what might be considered a gradient of what could be said about them?  An animal, inhuman person guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity being the lowest and Godly being the highest in terms of such a descriptive spectrum.

Anybody not understand this?