So the Royal Family in England takes their orders, what to say from parliament, or perhaps the unseen wealthy.
Now contrast that to what is represented in our Democracy today?
How does not substantial donations meet the legal definition of graft?
What evidence do I have of such control? When you have members of Congress unable to articulate or substaniate their opinions!
Also when you have federal judges, even at the Supreme Court level who are unable to articulate or accurately substantiate their opinions!
It is as if every concept of fairness in opinion is thrown out the door when they reach the highest level? All of the neutrality is gone? In favor of contriving their personal will! Or the will of those who cajole them through donations?
What is the bottom line? There needs to be more of a difference prevalent between us and those lesser forms of Government!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment