So I wanted to look up his service record.
1. It clearly states that he was never deployed.
2. It states that he guarded the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. And it states this:
"In addition to three riffle platoons, he was responsible for the selection, training and operations of the Sentinels of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldiers, the U.S. Army Drill Team, and the U.S. Army Color Guard Platoon. The Army is the senior service, responsible for the ceremonial training of all joint service participants at the White House, Pentagon, and throughout the national capital region. He maintained the capability to rapidly respond as an augmentation to security agencies and police authorities and planned and conducted infantry training at the company level."
So the next question would be highly relevant for him. "Tim how would he have defended the Capital against rioting Trump supporters?"
So it is relevant as he say's cushy things about Trump and Trump say's cushy things about him.
When he guarded that Tomb of the Unknown Soldier he indeed have live rounds in that rifle? (That is more of a rhetorical 3rd question.) Tim when you saw how Trump supporters stormed the Capital and the response of security did you think they should have used deadly force? And here I am getting hokey, Tim would you have used deadly force to protect the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier? (Great op for a lie back answer isn't it?)
3. According to the link this is referenced from, the Army would not characterize the nature of his discharge. And, he did not retire. So he was discharged.
So indeed if you have a father who served in WW2 you might have seen his discharge papers? And it is no big deal is it! It reads honorably discharged.
So question two would be, "Tim could you publish your discharge papers from the Army."
And if you think the media is ever going to ask these questions and get a straight answer, then you are clueless. And if you think Tim Michels would ever read this and respond to in per question like a mature adult?? I doubt it! There is a comment section right below this, if you would like to respond Tim. But that isn't the way that people like that act. They will bring up the generality of an important issue like this on television and then likely use derogatory terminology to characterize the nature of the enquiry. Time and again, a constant.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
https://minnesotarightnow.com/2022/07/16/tim-michels-military-experience-explored-he-commanded-the-tomb-of-the-unknown-soldier/
And do I really care if he had just had enough of the Army? No.
But the "Party" and that is all they really seem to be, want to characterize him as being a construction worker who shoveled gravel 10 hours a day for decades. And I don't believe that is true. Why not? Something like that builds character?
No comments:
Post a Comment