So, this question would seem to be the most central to the issue.
Why can't a homosexual man love a woman?
And vice versa, why can't a Lesbian love a man?
So they would say that they are just the way that they are.
But often when a man marries a woman he is somehow looking for one like his mom? It worked for his dad it would work for him? He got along with his mom and hence he wants to marry a woman that has that type of personality or looks or whatever he see's as being the same and important?
And I am not meaning to be a basher. But re-ask the first two questions in the terms of that last paragraph?
So our new age people want children to be able to decide their sexuality for themselves? I find that to be a little disingenuous.
*****'
No lets bring the Roman Catholic Church into the issue. Didn't that making the decision about what your sexuality should be come from the Roman Catholic Church? You have to decide to be celibate in order to be a Catholic Priest? I would just assert that is allowing a young person to make a decision with regard to their sexuality. And I would also state that it seems to me to be an unnatural decision to ask them to make? So in Rome they used to castrate boys because they wanted to make them higher pitched singers? In comparison to what? A rough husky voice?
Or rather to make a rough husky voice transition into more of a normal sounding voice? And where those singers primarily in Church, at the altar, altar boys? Hence it is marketing? If you have more normal or better voices singing up front you draw more patrons to your Church?
But in conjunction with that same church they were found guilty of sexually molesting a lot of children?
And perhaps here I divert to something I once heard on the Oprah show. She interviewed a child molester and that child molester said that when he sexually molested children he saw their whole lives pass before his eyes. Which means he saw their futures too? And when you know the future you can indeed profit from it? Did he see what their lives were meant to be? Or did he see what he ruined those lives to be?
So perhaps this second part of the article deals with the question, why would you motivate someone to have a Non heterosexual life? Do I dare say what would cause you to want them to make the choice about their sexuality? Why do you want to influence it? See what I am poking around at here?
******'
Okay back to the first section. So about parents as role models of heterosexuality. So let's say that you like your parents. Can't really find much flaw with them. You might not be aware of this next part. I met a person and she didn't really have anything good to say about her mother. Said she just drank and smoked a lot.
But perhaps you can't apply science to something that is controlled by academia? You ask yourself why isn't academia applying science and the scientific method of questioning something like this. And you come to the conclusion that the first section is a highly emotional area and reactive emotional area? Now perhaps that just sums it up good. But then think about that term that I just flushed out? How many areas whereby science should be applied to them are not because they are highly reactive emotional areas? Psychiatry would have you believe that the highly emotionally reactive insults that someone who is labeled schizophrenic are hearing are really somehow them insulting themselves in a highly emotionally reactive way? It doesn't hold up to logic does it. Doesn't hold a split candle to it, does it.
*****'
Full circle.
It doesn't seem like a mean question to ask does it?
"Why can't you love a woman?"
"Why can't you love a man?"
It is only because of the response that it seems something of bad motive is packed into the question? When really, it is just an innocent question? And do you know what? Perhaps it is a question that is most from the heart?
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment