Explaining 20,000 Years BC

Explaining 20,000 Years BC

Once the great effort is taken to explain things to someone that has a hard time understanding...the person explaining them will no longer be able to understand them in terms that they should be understood?

It is a lessening of a level of intelligence?

Perhaps it is best said this, degradation to a lower standard.

If I have to explain everything in terms that a complete idiot can understand then my mode of thinking has been forced to degrade to a lower standard. And you will see assertions from that person of the lower standard then being made. In support of the lower standard.

As if because they had to be conditioned to the lower standard it means the lower standard is superior?

******'

So when you have to explain concepts to someone that can't catch on, you have to degrade to a lower standard to do so?

In effect some of the details of the explanation will need to be eliminated so that the person of the lower standard can understand. But once the details are eliminated the person of the lower standard really hasn't been taught anything or learned anything.

The desire to want to catch on? The desire to want to be a part of a good brain wave? And not the desire that the lower standard brainwave should prevail.

The person of the lower standard is allowed to wrongly fill in the details and does so with their emotionally disturbed and reactionary vagueary. They didn't learn what they should because they were willfull not to learn it, whether or not by intent. They hence willfully interpret something, the details of understanding, in error. So that they can transform what is attempted to be taught to them as something they would never need to remember.

And here we get into the emotional royalty of the emotionally disturbed blissfully ignorant. I supposed to switch gears it could be stated this way, they have to be spoiled in every way in life, because they can't learn? So you have two elements of royalty. Them being spoiled, how the act of spoiling them is viewed by them. And the ignorance to the fact that they are being spoiled manifesting itself as them being spoiled. In other words that last sentence, they can't learn to not be spoiled.

So is someone like that prone to violence? Perhaps not as much as you think. Why not? Because they are not put to the test like the rest of us. Becuase it is known that they can't be put to the test. A test being representative of perhaps the standard they should be at in terms of maturity and intelligence at the age they are at.

And when they get into positions of authority it is a drag down of our entire nation. But a support group has been allowed which encourages them. And perhaps this is a form of fascism.

Kind of a sketchy writing but what the heck.

And perhaps a person that gets into special education as a teacher has a latent desire and motive to do so?

© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy