Lets say a girl uses that as her defense in a court of law? That she stabbed another girl to appease a fictional character?
And thereafter the media and court system picks up on that and that is what the case is referred to!
You have to be kidding me! If you believe that you should be ashamed to show your face on television or in public! If you believe that you should never wear a blue uniform with a badge on it.
So what really is the more likely motive?
The more likely motive is that one or two girls were insanely jealous of another girl and fixated on her! They fixated upon her to the point that they wanted to kill her!
Now I have not referenced any specific names here. So for all you know this could just be a generic general statement.
*****'
To put forth the delusion that a bad kid isn't a bad kid! Enough of that.
And this is indeed a prime example of thought blocking! That absolutely everyone should believe a defendants stated motive! It is absolutely sickening!
To think that our money has gone in support of people like this in positions of power, authority and management!
To repeat a defendants stated motive in order to give it complete credibility! Sickening.
And perhaps I will add to this later!
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
It has children out there asking the question, what can I get away with in the name of someone else?
The media needs to be changed? It can not be allowed to be owned or operated by those who believe in that sentence, "What can I get away with in the name of someone else."
No comments:
Post a Comment