So let's say you took someone's comments out of the context of their charismatic personality.
1. You wrote them out.
2. Then you reattributed those comments as having been said by someone that those who admire that person don't like.
With regard to 2 above you would never hear that group complain more about the person comments are falsely attributed to.
With regard to 1 above. It really won't matter what you or I think of that person, 1 above is how the history books will have that person "recorded."
Take the comments out of the context of the personality and paint the true personality based on what they actually said. It wouldn't look good.
Perhaps this is about personal responsibility for what you say and the meaning of what you say.
3. Okay, let's add a dimension to this.
Let's say for every bad thing they said they attempted to negate the negative sentiment of that by saying the exact opposite of that. And hence and so forth you wrote that contradictory statement below the original.
And then you weigh out all the contrary statements and you ask yourself what does that person believe.
And hence the weight of all they said cancels out to zero.
But yet their actions and true intent remain.
But with let's say the net weight of the statements is zero. Is that really negative in terms of the responsibility and pay they received. So we say that is really negative.
And hence forth we project forth the effect of one above, and it amounts to negative.
Now we take the exact opposite as in 3, and we project that forward, and because it is the extreme opposite of 1 it also amounts to a negative, because it is the extreme opposite.
Idk. Just pecking on my cell phone.
And hence it amounts to smoke and a mirror of the smoke. And when the smoke clears we ask why there was smoke? And more importantly, what or who did they.....
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment