The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Tuesday, November 20, 2018

Daylight Savings Time 11 20 2018

Daylight Savings Time 11 20 2018

On December 7th 2018 it Sunset will be at 4:16PM.  We fell back an hour on November 4th.  Which really means on December 7th the Sunset would have been at 5:16pm had the clocks not been changed.

So it looks like children are coming home from school closer to the sunset than if the daylight savings time had not been in effect.  Are children more likely to stay late after school and come home in the dark at 4:16 pm than the benefit seen below of them having a little extra sun in the morning to get to school?

December 7th 2018 is about the earliest sunset of the seasons.

What about morning. On December 7th Sunrise is 7:09am.  Had it not been for Daylights savings time change taking effect Sunrise would have been 8:09am.

Which is safer?  Worrying about them getting to school in the dark or coming home from school in the dark?

I would say that there is more risk for them coming home from school in the dark?

From my personal observation the low life's among us who only support their self esteem through substance use don't get up real early in the morning.  They start drinking alcohol around 9 or 10 am.  Pass-out.  Wake up start drinking again.  Then are up to completely no good.  Why do we as a nation need to support that behavior?  I would love nothing more than to deprive the unhappy of drugs that are a substitute for happiness and life.

******'
Off topic or new article.  

And why was the change made?  To benefit the American farmer?  So that we could ship our grains to other countries profitably and cause the populations of their competing ideologies to proliferate, exponentially?  It was for the benefit of the futures markets?  I want to make a negative comment about George Soros, but apparently you can't do that in the United States because your right to free speech doesn't apply to them?  But per our Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, Congress has the right to set the value of foreign currencies.

So lets say that we wouldn't pay up for Gold being mined by those forced into what amounts to slave labor in Africa.  And we set the value of that currency to near zero in relation to ours.  What happens next?  You would have the likes of England buying up that gold cheap.  Then we would buy it from England at the fair market value and they would make out really well.  So congress would have to take the next step with regard to currency and state, that because England bought that slave labor gold, their currency is worth next to zero compared to ours.  And those who manipulate financial markets would have a field day transferring that Gold until they defeated the system.  Someone who didn't do any work and wasn't capable of normal human relations would end up profiting and becoming wealthy and able to then wield political power.

And after awhile we would get even more problem children in government who would wine the whole thing doesn't work and defeat the system so that they could make immediate windfall profits as we go back to the way that they wanted it to be.  Slave labor minds the gold and they make the profit from it.

© 2018 Thomas Murphy


No comments:

Post a Comment